Skip to content
Hazard, Nebraska eviction risk overview
City brief · 150 residents

Hazard, NE Eviction Risk: LOW

Sherman County · Population 150

In 2026
Risk score
2.6
LOW

68th percentile, Nebraska.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.1 Average2.5 Now2.6
4.0 2.1 1976 · score 2.1 1977 · score 2.1 1978 · score 2.1 1979 · score 2.1 1980 · score 2.2 1981 · score 2.2 1982 · score 2.3 1983 · score 2.2 1984 · score 2.2 1985 · score 2.2 1986 · score 2.2 1987 · score 2.2 1988 · score 2.2 1989 · score 2.1 1990 · score 2.1 1991 · score 2.2 1992 · score 2.2 1993 · score 2.2 1994 · score 2.2 1995 · score 2.2 1996 · score 2.2 1997 · score 2.2 1998 · score 2.2 1999 · score 2.2 2000 · score 2.4 2001 · score 2.5 2002 · score 2.5 2003 · score 2.5 2004 · score 2.5 2005 · score 2.5 2006 · score 2.5 2007 · score 2.5 2008 · score 2.8 2009 · score 2.9 2010 · score 3.0 2011 · score 3.0 2012 · score 2.9 2013 · score 2.8 2014 · score 2.8 2015 · score 2.7 2016 · score 2.7 2017 · score 2.7 2018 · score 2.6 2019 · score 2.6 2020 · score 3.7 2021 · score 4.0 2022 · score 3.1 2023 · score 2.8 2024 · score 2.7 2025 · score 2.6 2026 · score 2.6

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.9 Regional 2.9 State 1.8 Economic 4.8 Supply 2.9 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 2.0 Tenant 2.9 Housing 1.3 2.6 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +60.2% (2024)
    2.9
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.9
  3. State political climate
    Nebraska legislature & governorship
    1.8
  4. Economic stress
    25.0% poverty · 2.3% unemp.
    4.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $875 average · 14.9% renters
    2.9
  6. Rent Control risk
    18.9% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    30 days filing → judgment
    2.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    14.9% renters
    2.9
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Hazard and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Hazard compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Sherman County
High
#2 of 6 cities
Rank in county, 80th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 6 cities in Sherman County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Nebraska
Elevated
#239 of 593 cities
Rank in state, 60th percentileLowHigh
#239 of 593 cities in Nebraska for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Hazard risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Hazard: 2.62.6HazardThis cityCounty: 2.62.6Countyavg in countyState: 2.92.9Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.6
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 30d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $875/mo. A contested eviction takes 30 days and costs $901–$2,673 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 14.9%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 150 residents, 14.9% rent. 19% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 25.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.9
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.9 and 2.9 (GOP margin +60.2% (2024)). State climate at 1.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2, housing court bias 1.3, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.8. Supply constraint: 2.9. The numbers behind those: 25.0% poverty, 2.3% unemployment, 19% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Hazard sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
00Overview

About eviction risk in Hazard, NE

Landlording in Hazard, Nebraska, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.6/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Hazard is a city of 150 residents where 14.9% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 18.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $875/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Hazard eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Hazard closes 30 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Hazard's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Hazard runs $901 to $2,673 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 30 days of typical timeline and $875/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.9/10 in Hazard, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Nebraska, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Hazard: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Nebraska's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,673 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Hazard

Trap · R+57.6
Hazard reflects the demographic and political composition of Sherman County, with eviction procedure governed at the state level. Sherman County 2020 margin: R+57.6.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the fastest way to get a non-paying tenant out in Hazard?

The fastest way is to serve the 7-day pay-or-quit notice promptly after rent is late. If they don't pay or leave, file for eviction in court immediately after the 7 days are up. Don't delay; every day you wait is lost rent. Sometimes, "cash for keys" can be even faster if the tenant agrees to move out quickly.

Q2

Can I evict a tenant in Hazard for no reason?

If you have a month-to-month lease, yes, you can terminate the tenancy without cause by providing a 30-day notice. If it's a fixed-term lease, you generally need a lease violation (like non-payment) to evict before the lease term ends. Nebraska does not have statewide just-cause eviction requirements.

Q3

How much notice do I need to give for a rent increase in Hazard?

Nebraska law requires a 30-day written notice for any rent increase. Make sure your lease allows for rent increases and specifies the notice period, even if it defaults to 30 days under state law. Always provide clear, written notice.

Q4

What if my tenant claims the property is unlivable to avoid eviction?

This is a common defense tactic. You must ensure your property meets all health and safety codes. Keep meticulous records of all maintenance requests and repairs. If a tenant raises habitability issues, address them promptly and document your actions. If they bring this up in court, your documentation will be crucial. This is a situation where calling an attorney is a good idea.

Q5

Can I keep the security deposit for unpaid rent in Hazard?

Yes, under Nebraska law, you can deduct unpaid rent, damages beyond normal wear and tear, and other legitimate costs from the security deposit. You must provide an itemized statement of deductions within 14 days of the tenant vacating the property. Be specific and keep receipts for any repair costs.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.6/10 places Hazard in the 68th percentile of Nebraska cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.