Skip to content
Arlington, Nebraska eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,467 residents

Arlington, NE Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Washington County · Population 1,467

In 2026
Risk score
2.4
VERY LOW

38th percentile, Nebraska.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.0 Average2.3 Now2.4
3.8 2.0 1976 · score 2.0 1977 · score 2.0 1978 · score 2.0 1979 · score 2.0 1980 · score 2.1 1981 · score 2.1 1982 · score 2.2 1983 · score 2.1 1984 · score 2.1 1985 · score 2.1 1986 · score 2.1 1987 · score 2.1 1988 · score 2.1 1989 · score 2.0 1990 · score 2.0 1991 · score 2.1 1992 · score 2.1 1993 · score 2.1 1994 · score 2.1 1995 · score 2.1 1996 · score 2.1 1997 · score 2.1 1998 · score 2.1 1999 · score 2.1 2000 · score 2.2 2001 · score 2.2 2002 · score 2.2 2003 · score 2.2 2004 · score 2.2 2005 · score 2.2 2006 · score 2.2 2007 · score 2.2 2008 · score 2.6 2009 · score 2.7 2010 · score 2.7 2011 · score 2.7 2012 · score 2.6 2013 · score 2.5 2014 · score 2.4 2015 · score 2.4 2016 · score 2.4 2017 · score 2.3 2018 · score 2.3 2019 · score 2.4 2020 · score 3.6 2021 · score 3.8 2022 · score 3.0 2023 · score 2.6 2024 · score 2.5 2025 · score 2.4 2026 · score 2.4

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.7 Regional 3.7 State 1.8 Economic 2.9 Supply 5.8 Rent Control 6.0 Eviction 1.7 Tenant 5.0 Housing 4.3 2.4 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +42.4% (2024)
    3.7
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.7
  3. State political climate
    Nebraska legislature & governorship
    1.8
  4. Economic stress
    3.8% poverty · 0.6% unemp.
    2.9
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,000 average · 17.5% renters
    5.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    27.1% of income on rent
    6.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    32 days filing → judgment
    1.7
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    17.5% renters
    5.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Arlington and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Arlington compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Washington County
Moderate
#4 of 6 cities
Rank in county, 40th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 6 cities in Washington County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Nebraska
Low
#372 of 593 cities
Rank in state, 37th percentileLowHigh
#372 of 593 cities in Nebraska for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Arlington risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Arlington: 2.42.4ArlingtonThis cityCounty: 2.72.7Countyavg in countyState: 2.92.9Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.4
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.4 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 32d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,000/mo. A contested eviction takes 32 days and costs $988–$2,842 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 17.5%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,467 residents, 17.5% rent. 27% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 3.8% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.7
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.7 and 3.7 (GOP margin +42.4% (2024)). State climate at 1.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.7, housing court bias 4.3, rent-control risk 6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.3 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 2.9
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 2.9. Supply constraint: 5.8. The numbers behind those: 3.8% poverty, 0.6% unemployment, 27% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Arlington sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Omaha, NE · 32d · ~$2.0k all-in ($63/day) · score 3.2 Omaha Lincoln, NE · 28d · ~$2.2k all-in ($79/day) · score 3.1 Lincoln Bellevue, NE · 32d · ~$2.1k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.9 Bellevue Grand Island, NE · 29d · ~$2.0k all-in ($71/day) · score 3 Grand Island Des Moines, IA · 41d · ~$2.8k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.6 Des Moines Sioux Falls, SD · 21d · ~$1.6k all-in ($77/day) · score 1.7 Sioux Falls Sioux City, IA · 47d · ~$2.7k all-in ($58/day) · score 2.5 Sioux City Ankeny, IA · 46d · ~$2.5k all-in ($55/day) · score 2.3 Ankeny St. Joseph, MO · 41d · ~$2.3k all-in ($57/day) · score 2.2 St. Joseph West Des Moines, IA · 44d · ~$3.0k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.3 West Des Moines Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Arlington
Arlington · 32d · ~$1.9k all-in ($60/day) · score 2.4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Arlington, NE

Landlording in Arlington, Nebraska, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.4/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Arlington is a city of 1,467 residents where 17.5% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 27.1% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,000/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Arlington eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.7/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Arlington closes 32 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Arlington's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Arlington runs $988 to $2,842 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 32 days of typical timeline and $1,000/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 5/10 in Arlington, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Nebraska, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Arlington: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Nebraska's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,842 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Arlington

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Arlington to neighboring cities in Washington County via the grid below. The 3.7/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under Neb. Rev. Stat. 76-1401. Washington County 2020 presidential margin: R+40.3. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Nebraska statutory detail.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant just disappears?

If your tenant abandons the property in Arlington, you need to follow proper procedure to reclaim it. Document everything, photos of the empty unit, utilities shut off, mail piling up. Send a notice of abandonment to their last known address. If they don't respond within a specific timeframe (often 7-14 days in Nebraska, check with a local attorney), you can then legally re-enter and take possession. Do not assume abandonment; always send proper notice.

Q2

Can I turn off utilities if a tenant doesn't pay?

Absolutely not. Turning off utilities (water, electricity, gas) is considered a self-help eviction and is illegal in Nebraska. You could face significant penalties. Even if the tenant is severely delinquent, you must follow the formal eviction process through the courts.

Q3

How much can I charge for late fees in Arlington?

Nebraska law allows for "reasonable" late fees, but it doesn't specify an exact cap. Generally, a late fee of 5-10% of the monthly rent is considered reasonable. It must be clearly stated in your lease agreement. Don't try to charge exorbitant late fees; a judge might reduce them if challenged.

Q4

Do I need to give a reason to not renew a lease?

In Nebraska, for a periodic tenancy (month-to-month), you can generally choose not to renew a lease without a specific "just cause," provided you give the proper 30-day notice. For a fixed-term lease, the lease simply expires. However, you cannot refuse to renew for discriminatory reasons. Always document your non-renewal decision.

Q5

What if the tenant leaves personal belongings behind after an eviction?

If a tenant leaves personal property after an eviction in Arlington, you generally have a legal obligation to store it for a certain period (often 7-14 days in Nebraska, but confirm with local counsel). You must send a notice to the tenant's last known address, informing them where to retrieve their belongings and the deadline. After that period, if they haven't claimed it, you can typically dispose of it or sell it, deducting reasonable storage costs.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.4/10 places Arlington in the 38th percentile of Nebraska cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.