Skip to content
Neighborhood · Sparks, NV

Singing Hills Eviction Risk: Lower

1 census tracts · pop 3,057 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3.9/10 · range 3.9–3.9

Singing Hills maps to a single census tract in Sparks, NV, population 3,057. Scored across those inputs it reaches 3.9/10, placing it in the Lower tier. Cost burden runs around two-thirds against 30.3% citywide, putting Singing Hills 38.3% over its own city.

Pulling the other way is economic stress, at 1.4/10. On the softer side is rent-regulation exposure, at 1.5/10. 20% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate.

Well under the midpoint is tenant-organizing strength, at 2.5/10. The voucher gap is 14.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which shows up as churn rather than arrears.

At $1,973 a month, rents sit 15% over what the rest of Sparks commands. Among the 7 mapped neighborhoods of Sparks, it ranks #3 by risk, the middle third. Poverty sits at 6%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Annual rent works out to 31% of average household income of $75,370. 47% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

One tract means one number: 3.9/10 applies directly to any address inside the boundary. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
1 tracts · population-weighted
Singing Hills vs Sparks How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
68.6% +126%
Sparks: 30.3%
Average gross rent
$1,973 +15%
Sparks: $1,716
Average HH income
$75,370 -13%
Sparks: $86,979
Poverty rate
5.7% -37%
Sparks: 9.0%
Renter share
46.9% +17%
Sparks: 40.2%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Singing Hills and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 3.9–3.9

Why Singing Hills scores 3.9

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 3.7–3.7 across tracts
3.7
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 5.2–5.2 across tracts
5.2
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 4.0–4.0 across tracts
4.0
Rent control risk
69% of income on rent · Range 1.5–1.5 across tracts
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 3.5–3.5 across tracts
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
47% renter households · Range 2.5–2.5 across tracts
2.5
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 3.0–3.0 across tracts
3.0
Economic stress
5.7% below poverty line · Range 1.4–1.4 across tracts
1.4
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 6.5–6.5 across tracts
6.5
Risk score comparison

Singing Hills vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Singing Hills score vs. parent city, state, U.S.Singing Hills: 3.93.9Singing HillsNeighborhoodParent city: 4.04.0Parent cityhost cityState: 4.54.5Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.15.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Singing Hills

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
32031003521 3.9 3,057 69% $1,973
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 61

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 74%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 84%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 60%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 16%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Singing Hills

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Singing Hills

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Singing Hills?

Singing Hills scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Singing Hills compare to Sparks overall?

Singing Hills scores 0.1 points lower than Sparks overall (4/10). Renters spend 69% of income on rent vs 30% citywide. Average rent: $1,973 vs $1,716.
Q3

What is the average rent in Singing Hills?

Average gross rent in Singing Hills is $1,973/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Singing Hills residents are renters?

47% of Singing Hills households are renter-occupied (vs 40% in Sparks). The neighborhood has 3,057 residents.
Q5

Is Singing Hills a high social-vulnerability area?

Singing Hills sits in the 61st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (moderately vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Singing Hills for landlords?

Singing Hills carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3.9/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Sparks as a whole (4/10), this neighborhood is in line with the citywide level.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Singing Hills?

Singing Hills has 3,050 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (57.9%), Hispanic / Latino (26.1%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (6.9%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Singing Hills

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Sparks

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Singing Hills.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further