Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #50,654 of 84,120 nationally

Singing Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Sparks

Tract 32031003521 · Washoe, NV · pop 3,057 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Census tract 32031003521 covers part of the Singing Hills area of Sparks, NV, and scores 3.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,057 residents. Against Washoe County at 44.0%, 69% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
3.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 15% Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,156
Renter share46.9%
SVI overall0.61
Poverty rate5.7%
Median income$75,370

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Singing Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#13 of 26 tracts In Sparks
Moderate
Within county
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#72 of 139 tracts In Washoe
Moderate
Within state
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#446 of 779 tracts In Nevada
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sparks and the region

Centroid at 39.5931, -119.7225 · click any tract to drill in

Why Singing Hills scores 3.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sparks
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.2
State political climate
Nevada legislature & governorship
3.7
Economic stress
5.7% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,973 rent vs county FMR
6.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sparks
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sparks
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sparks
3.0

How Singing Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Singing Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.93.9This tracttract 003521Sparks: 4.04.0Sparksparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 61

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Singing Hills

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.4/10. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10.

Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Well under the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 2.5/10. Average gross rent is $1,973, 15% above the Sparks average.

The voucher gap is 14.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Nationally it ranks #50,654 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 6.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 6%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

It tracks the Washoe County average of 4.1 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 32031003521

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 32031003521?

Census tract 32031003521 in the Singing Hills neighborhood scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 32031003521?

Median gross rent is $1,973/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 32031003521?

5.7% of residents in tract 32031003521 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,057.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 32031003521?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 61th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 84th, minority 60th, housing 16th.
Q5

Is tract 32031003521 considered part of Singing Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 32031003521 fall within Singing Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 32031003521 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 32031003521 compare to Sparks overall?

Tract 32031003521 scores 3.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Sparks at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sparks eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sparks

Top eight tracts in Sparks ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related