Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #80,791 of 84,120 nationally

Pannaway Manor Eviction Risk: Lower , Portsmouth

Tract 33015107400 · Rockingham County, NH · pop 1,221 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

The Lower-tier score of 3.9/10 for census tract 33015107400 reflects conditions in the Pannaway Manor area of Portsmouth, New Hampshire. That is riskier than about 10% of US census tracts.

0% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $122,321 a year. About 4% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 4% Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units451
Renter share4.4%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate2.9%
Median income$122,321

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Pannaway Manor
Moderate
Within parent city
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 7 tracts In Portsmouth
Very Low
Within county
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#51 of 72 tracts In Rockingham County
Low
Within state
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#303 of 349 tracts In New Hampshire
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Portsmouth and the region

Centroid at 43.0629, -70.8030 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pannaway Manor scores 1.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portsmouth
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
New Hampshire legislature & governorship
2.5
Economic stress
2.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portsmouth
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portsmouth
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portsmouth
4.5

How Pannaway Manor compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pannaway Manor risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.31.3This tracttract 107400Portsmouth: 3.93.9Portsmouthparent cityCounty: 1.71.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.72.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 11

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pannaway Manor

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Portsmouth eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Rockingham County average of 4.6 and below the New Hampshire statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 11th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 33015107400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 33015107400?

Census tract 33015107400 in the Pannaway Manor neighborhood scores 1.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 33015107400?

2.9% of residents in tract 33015107400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,221.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 33015107400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 37th, minority 19th, housing 18th.
Q4

Is tract 33015107400 considered part of Pannaway Manor?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 33015107400 fall within Pannaway Manor (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q5

What share of households in tract 33015107400 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 33015107400 compare to Portsmouth overall?

Tract 33015107400 scores 1.3/10, lower than the parent city of Portsmouth at 3.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portsmouth eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Portsmouth

Top eight tracts in Portsmouth ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related