Neighborhood · Ranked #44,239 of 84,120 nationally
Shaws Hill Eviction Risk: Moderate , Portsmouth
Tract 33015069700 ·
Rockingham County, NH · pop 3,192 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Census tract 33015069700 covers part of the Shaws Hill area of Portsmouth, NH, and scores 4.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9/10.
Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%Stable renters 14%Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units1,490
Renter share23.0%
SVI overall0.18
Poverty rate3.0%
Median income$113,333
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Shaws Hill
Moderate
Within parent city
33th percentile
#5 of 7 tracts In Portsmouth
Low
Within county
54th percentile
#34 of 72 tracts In Rockingham County
Moderate
Within state
60th percentile
#142 of 349 tracts In New Hampshire
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Portsmouth and the region
Centroid at 43.0699, -70.7407 · click any tract to drill in
Why Shaws Hill scores 4.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portsmouth
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
New Hampshire legislature & governorship
2.5
Economic stress
3.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,757 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portsmouth
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portsmouth
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portsmouth
4.5
How Shaws Hill compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 18
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
3%Socioeconomic
25%Household composition
10%Racial/ethnic minority
71%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
5.2%Housing insecurity
3.6%Utility-shutoff threat
6.4%Food insecurity
3.8%SNAP enrollment
4.0%Transit barriers
4.9%No health insurance
12.1%Frequent mental distress
24.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Shaws Hill
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. The severe-burden share is 23%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Against Rockingham County at 45.1%, 39% of renters here are cost-burdened. On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.5/10. Housing insecurity runs 5.2% against 14.2% nationally.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. That is riskier than roughly 47% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
At 23% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.7/10.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the Rockingham County average of 4.3 closely.
Average gross rent is $1,757, close to the Portsmouth average.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 33015069700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 33015069700?
Census tract 33015069700 in the Shaws Hill neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 33015069700?
Median gross rent is $1,757/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 33015069700?
3.0% of residents in tract 33015069700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,192.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 33015069700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 18th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 25th, minority 10th, housing 71th.
Q5
Is tract 33015069700 considered part of Shaws Hill?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 33015069700 fall within Shaws Hill (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 33015069700 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 33015069700 compare to Portsmouth overall?
Tract 33015069700 scores 4.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Portsmouth at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portsmouth eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Portsmouth
Top eight tracts in Portsmouth ranked by composite eviction-risk score.