Koreatown Eviction Risk: High , Fort Lee
Tract 34003041100 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 5,403 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
34003041100 is a census tract in the Koreatown area of Palisades Park, NJ. It scores 9.1/10 for landlords. Population here is 5,403. 64% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Bergen County average of 46.6%.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Fort Lee and the region
Centroid at 40.8505, -74.0023 · click any tract to drill in
Why Koreatown scores 9.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Koreatown compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 73
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 80%Socioeconomic
- 32%Household composition
- 87%Racial/ethnic minority
- 64%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 52%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 372Total filings over 5 yrs
- 4.78%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.4%Peak (2013)
- 48Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Koreatown. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.4%Housing insecurity
- 5.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.9%Food insecurity
- 6.5%SNAP enrollment
- 6.5%Transit barriers
- 10.0%No health insurance
- 11.5%Frequent mental distress
- 19.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Koreatown
Against the Bergen County average of 6.3, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.8 points. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.7/10.
Severe burden reaches 29%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.9/10.
Disability prevalence runs 19.4% against 31.5% nationally. SNAP participation runs 6.5% against 15.2% nationally. Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 372 filings here across 5 tracked years.
On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7/10. Average gross rent is $1,742, 13% below the Palisades Park average. The worst year on record was 2013, when 6.4% of renter households were served.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 4.8% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 95th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Social vulnerability reads 7.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the NJ average is 6.0, so this tract runs 3.1 points hotter.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 34003041100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003041100?
What is the average rent in tract 34003041100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34003041100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34003041100?
Is tract 34003041100 considered part of Koreatown?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34003041100?
What share of households in tract 34003041100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34003041100 compare to Fort Lee overall?
Was tract 34003041100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Fort Lee
Top eight tracts in Fort Lee ranked by composite eviction-risk score.