Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #10,727 of 84,120 nationally

Garfield Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 34003021102 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 2,587

Tract 34003021102 sits in Garfield eviction risk, NJ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 7.4/10. It is home to 2,587 residents. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.4/10.

Risk score
7.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 24% Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units1,021
Renter share41.8%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate3.9%
Median income$86,434

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In Garfield
Very Low
Within county
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#55 of 203 tracts In Bergen County
Elevated
Within state
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#543 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
High
National
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#10,727 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Garfield and the region

Centroid at 40.8845, -74.1086 · click any tract to drill in

Why Garfield scores 7.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Garfield
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,689 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Garfield
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Garfield
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Garfield
6.7

How Garfield compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Garfield risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.4This tracttract 0211027.0Garfieldparent city6.3Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 21

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Garfield

Severe burden reaches 28%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.9/10.

Against the Bergen County average of 6.3, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points. 41% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, below the Bergen County average of 46.6%.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Bergen Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #10,727 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the NJ average is 6.0, so this tract runs 1.4 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Average gross rent is $1,689, close to the Garfield average. Annual rent works out to 23% of average household income of $86,434.

42% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 34003021102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003021102?

Census tract 34003021102 in Garfield scores 7.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34003021102?

Median gross rent is $1,689/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34003021102?

3.9% of residents in tract 34003021102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,587.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34003021102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 5th, minority 27th, housing 17th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 34003021102 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 34003021102 compare to Garfield overall?

Tract 34003021102 scores 7.4/10, higher than the parent city of Garfield at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Garfield eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 34003021102 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Garfield

Top eight tracts in Garfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related