Northeast Ridgewood Eviction Risk: Moderate , Ho-Ho-Kus
Tract 34003047100 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 6,240 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
With a score of 4.9/10, tract 34003047100 in the Northeast Ridgewood area of Ridgewood, NJ reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 6,240 residents. Against Bergen County at 46.6%, roughly one in three of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Ho-Ho-Kus and the region
Centroid at 40.9886, -74.0981 · click any tract to drill in
Why Northeast Ridgewood scores 4.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Northeast Ridgewood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 22
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 7%Socioeconomic
- 77%Household composition
- 57%Racial/ethnic minority
- 18%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 11%Grade B
- 80%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 21Total filings over 5 yrs
- 2.04%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.9%Peak (2014)
- 1Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Northeast Ridgewood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.5%Housing insecurity
- 3.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.5%Food insecurity
- 2.5%SNAP enrollment
- 3.5%Transit barriers
- 4.8%No health insurance
- 11.7%Frequent mental distress
- 16.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Northeast Ridgewood
The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. Severe burden reaches 24%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Disability prevalence runs 16.1% against 31.5% nationally.
Running hot, court filing pressure reads 7.9/10. It sits 1.4 points below the Bergen County average of 6.3.
Food insecurity runs 5.5% against 17.8% nationally. Court records carry 21 eviction filings across 5 observed years.
The voucher gap is 12.3%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Filings peaked in 2014 at 5.9% of renter households.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 2.0% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 59% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 5% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 34003047100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003047100?
What is the average rent in tract 34003047100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34003047100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34003047100?
Is tract 34003047100 considered part of Northeast Ridgewood?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34003047100?
What share of households in tract 34003047100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34003047100 compare to Ho-Ho-Kus overall?
Was tract 34003047100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Ho-Ho-Kus
Top eight tracts in Ho-Ho-Kus ranked by composite eviction-risk score.