Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally
Mount Pleasant Eviction Risk: Moderate , Saddle River
Tract 34003053100 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 3,363 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Tract 34003053100 sits in the Mount Pleasant area of Saddle River, NJ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.2/10. It is home to 3,363 residents. Severe burden reaches 27%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,372
Renter share14.4%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate4.8%
Median income$236,985
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
24
th percentile
Low
Within state
41
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Saddle River and the region
Centroid at 41.0237, -74.0926 · click any tract to drill in
Why Mount Pleasant scores 5.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Saddle River
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.8% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,709 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Saddle River
8.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Saddle River
3.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Saddle River
6.0
How Mount Pleasant compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 22%Socioeconomic
- 34%Household composition
- 46%Racial/ethnic minority
- 35%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 1%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 17Total filings over 5 yrs
- 1.91%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.0%Peak (2018)
- 5Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 25% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Mount Pleasant. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.1%Housing insecurity
- 2.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.6%Food insecurity
- 2.7%SNAP enrollment
- 3.5%Transit barriers
- 5.2%No health insurance
- 11.3%Frequent mental distress
- 20.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Mount Pleasant
What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 8.9/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.2/10.
At $1,709 a month, rents run 23% under what the rest of Saddle River commands. SNAP participation runs 2.7% against 15.2% nationally. 54% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Bergen County average of 46.6%.
Food insecurity runs 5.6% against 17.8% nationally. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 7.9/10.
It sits 1.1 points below the Bergen County average of 6.3. The filing record is not thin: 17 evictions over 5 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2018 at 3.0% of renter households.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 1.9% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 34003053100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003053100?
Census tract 34003053100 in the Mount Pleasant neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34003053100?
Median gross rent is $1,709/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34003053100?
4.8% of residents in tract 34003053100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,363.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34003053100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 22th, household 34th, minority 46th, housing 35th.
Q5
Is tract 34003053100 considered part of Mount Pleasant?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34003053100 fall within Mount Pleasant (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34003053100?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 17 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 34003053100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.91% of renter households, peaking at 3.0% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34003053100 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34003053100 compare to Saddle River overall?
Tract 34003053100 scores 5.2/10, lower than the parent city of Saddle River at 5.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Saddle River; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34003053100 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related