Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #22,681 of 84,120 nationally
Barrington Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 34007606600 · Camden County, NJ · pop 2,487
34007606600 is a census tract in Barrington, NJ. It scores 5.6/10 for landlords. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17%
Stable renters 31%
Owners 52%
Tract context
Occupied units1,191
Renter share48.2%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate6.1%
Median income$84,383
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
55
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
49
th percentile
Moderate
National
73
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Barrington and the region
Centroid at 39.8732, -75.0453 · click any tract to drill in
Why Barrington scores 5.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Barrington
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.1% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$1,384 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Barrington
4.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Barrington
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Barrington
4.2
How Barrington compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 46%Socioeconomic
- 13%Household composition
- 22%Racial/ethnic minority
- 29%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 14%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 25%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 218Total filings over 6 yrs
- 10.77%Avg annual filing rate
- 14.4%Peak (2014)
- 16Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.8%Housing insecurity
- 4.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.7%Food insecurity
- 4.3%SNAP enrollment
- 4.9%Transit barriers
- 6.5%No health insurance
- 14.8%Frequent mental distress
- 21.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Barrington
Against Camden County at 48.5%, 35% of renters here are cost-burdened. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 9/10.
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.5/10. SNAP participation runs 4.3% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 7.7% against 17.8% nationally.
The severe-burden share is 9%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The filing record is not thin: 218 evictions over 6 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2014, when 14.4% of renter households were served.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Camden. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 10.8% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 73rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.4/10. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
It tracks the Camden County average of 5.7 closely.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007606600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007606600?
Census tract 34007606600 in Barrington scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007606600?
Median gross rent is $1,384/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007606600?
6.1% of residents in tract 34007606600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,487.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007606600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 46th, household 13th, minority 22th, housing 29th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007606600?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 218 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007606600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.77% of renter households, peaking at 14.4% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 34007606600 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 34007606600 compare to Barrington overall?
Tract 34007606600 scores 5.6/10, lower than the parent city of Barrington at 6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Barrington; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 34007606600 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Barrington
Top eight tracts in Barrington ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related