Within neighborhood
40
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,681 of 84,120 nationally
Fairview Eviction Risk: Moderate , Gloucester City
Tract 34007611000 · Camden County, NJ · pop 6,432 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
Census tract 34007611000 covers part of the Fairview area of Gloucester City, NJ, and scores 5.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31%
Stable renters 28%
Owners 41%
Tract context
Occupied units2,276
Renter share58.5%
SVI overall0.80
Poverty rate13.5%
Median income$60,133
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
52
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
49
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Gloucester City and the region
Centroid at 39.8954, -75.1254 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fairview scores 5.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Gloucester City
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
13.5% poverty · this tract
3.4
Supply constraint
$1,420 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Gloucester City
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Gloucester City
3.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Gloucester City
4.9
How Fairview compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 80
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 74%Socioeconomic
- 93%Household composition
- 57%Racial/ethnic minority
- 60%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 4%Grade B
- 9%Grade C
- 17%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,031Total filings over 6 yrs
- 18.41%Avg annual filing rate
- 25.0%Peak (2013)
- 165Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 29% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Fairview. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 16.9%Housing insecurity
- 10.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 21.4%Food insecurity
- 15.6%SNAP enrollment
- 10.8%Transit barriers
- 13.9%No health insurance
- 20.0%Frequent mental distress
- 32.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fairview
Severe burden reaches 24%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.9/10. Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 1,031 filings here across 6 tracked years.
Against Camden County at 48.5%, roughly one in two of renters here are cost-burdened. The worst year on record was 2013, when 25.0% of renter households were served.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 18.4% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 73rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Social vulnerability reads 8.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Camden County average of 5.7 closely.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007611000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007611000?
Census tract 34007611000 in the Fairview neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007611000?
Median gross rent is $1,420/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007611000?
13.5% of residents in tract 34007611000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,432.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007611000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 80th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 74th, household 93th, minority 57th, housing 60th.
Q5
Is tract 34007611000 considered part of Fairview?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34007611000 fall within Fairview (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007611000?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 1,031 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007611000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 18.41% of renter households, peaking at 25.0% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34007611000 struggle to pay rent?
About 16.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34007611000 compare to Gloucester City overall?
Tract 34007611000 scores 5.6/10, higher than the parent city of Gloucester City at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Gloucester City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34007611000 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 17% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Gloucester City
Top eight tracts in Gloucester City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related