Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,622 of 84,120 nationally

Pyne Point Eviction Risk: High , Camden

Tract 34007600800 · Camden County, NJ · pop 5,211 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

34007600800 is a census tract in the Pyne Point area of Camden, NJ. It scores 8.8/10 for landlords. It is home to 5,211 residents. It sits 3.1 points above the Camden County average of 5.7.

Risk score
8.8
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 40% Stable renters 32% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units1,659
Renter share71.9%
SVI overall1.00
Poverty rate41.7%
Median income$19,261

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Pyne Point
Moderate
Within parent city
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 19 tracts In Camden
Moderate
Within county
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 129 tracts In Camden County
High
Within state
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#210 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Camden and the region

Centroid at 39.9514, -75.1138 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pyne Point scores 8.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Camden
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
41.7% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camden
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camden
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camden
7.0

How Pyne Point compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pyne Point risk score vs. parent city / county / state8.8This tracttract 6008007.4Camdenparent city5.7Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 100

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,159Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 14.13%Avg annual filing rate
  • 19.3%Peak (2015)
  • 159Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 34007600800
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 6 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pyne Point

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 10/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 35.2% against 11.3% nationally. The poverty rate is 42%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Running hot, court filing pressure reads 9.4/10. 23% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

This is renter territory: 72% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 24.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. 56% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Camden County average of 48.5%.

Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 1,159 filings here across 6 tracked years. On the high side, local political climate reads 7/10. The worst year on record was 2015, when 19.3% of renter households were served.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 34007600800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007600800?

Census tract 34007600800 in the Pyne Point neighborhood scores 8.8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 34007600800?

41.7% of residents in tract 34007600800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,211.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 34007600800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 100th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 100th, minority 96th, housing 97th.
Q4

Is tract 34007600800 considered part of Pyne Point?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34007600800 fall within Pyne Point (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007600800?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 1,159 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007600800 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.13% of renter households, peaking at 19.3% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 34007600800 struggle to pay rent?

About 38.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 24.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 34007600800 compare to Camden overall?

Tract 34007600800 scores 8.8/10, higher than the parent city of Camden at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camden eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 34007600800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 50% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Camden

Top eight tracts in Camden ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related