Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally

Echelon Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 34007607502 · Camden County, NJ · pop 6,492 · 54% of tract blocks fall in Echelon

Census tract 34007607502 covers part of Echelon, NJ, and scores 5.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. The severe-burden share is 34%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 3% Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units2,318
Renter share8.7%
SVI overall0.37
Poverty rate1.7%
Median income$136,762

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Echelon
Very Low
Within county
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#74 of 129 tracts In Camden County
Moderate
Within state
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#1,286 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Moderate
National
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#29,336 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Echelon and the region

Centroid at 39.8503, -74.9743 · click any tract to drill in

Why Echelon scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Echelon
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
1.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,595 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Echelon
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Echelon
9.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Echelon
6.0

How Echelon compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Echelon risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.2This tracttract 6075026.6Echelonparent city5.7Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 37

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 158Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 8.66%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.3%Peak (2013)
  • 34Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 34007607502
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Echelon

What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.7/10. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 9.4/10.

Cost burden runs 60% here against 48.5% across Camden County. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10.

Food insecurity runs 8.1% against 17.8% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 158 evictions over 6 years of observation. Housing insecurity runs 6.6% against 14.2% nationally.

Filings peaked in 2013 at 9.3% of renter households. In a typical year about 8.7% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 65th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 9% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 4.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Rent consumes only 14% of average household income of $136,762, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 34007607502

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007607502?

Census tract 34007607502 in Echelon scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34007607502?

Median gross rent is $1,595/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34007607502?

1.7% of residents in tract 34007607502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,492.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34007607502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 37th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 23th, household 57th, minority 47th, housing 48th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007607502?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 158 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007607502 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.66% of renter households, peaking at 9.3% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 34007607502 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 34007607502 compare to Echelon overall?

Tract 34007607502 scores 5.2/10, lower than the parent city of Echelon at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Echelon; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Echelon

Top eight tracts in Echelon ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related