Cramer Hill Eviction Risk: High , Camden
Tract 34007600900 · Camden County, NJ · pop 3,804 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Eviction risk in Cramer Hill in Camden centers on tract 34007600900, which scores 7.7/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 3,804 residents. That puts it among the highest-scoring tracts in the entire country, the top 1% nationally for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 51% of renter households, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $984 a month while the average household earns $32,813 a year, roughly 36% of income at the averages. About 73% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Camden and the region
Centroid at 39.9533, -75.1016 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cramer Hill scores 9.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Cramer Hill compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 99
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 95%Socioeconomic
- 100%Household composition
- 99%Racial/ethnic minority
- 85%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 22%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 731Total filings over 6 yrs
- 12.02%Avg annual filing rate
- 15.1%Peak (2013)
- 143Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 44.2%Housing insecurity
- 28.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 58.4%Food insecurity
- 49.2%SNAP enrollment
- 28.4%Transit barriers
- 41.6%No health insurance
- 23.4%Frequent mental distress
- 47.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Cramer Hill
The score leans hardest on economic stress at 7.9/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Camden eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Camden County average of 6.8 and above the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 99th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 731 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 12.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 15.1% of renter households in 2013.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 34007600900
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007600900?
What is the average rent in tract 34007600900?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007600900?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007600900?
Is tract 34007600900 considered part of Cramer Hill?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007600900?
What share of households in tract 34007600900 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34007600900 compare to Camden overall?
Was tract 34007600900 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Camden
Top eight tracts in Camden ranked by composite eviction-risk score.