Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #35,669 of 84,120 nationally

Runnemede Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 34007607100 · Camden County, NJ · pop 3,994

With a score of 4.8/10, tract 34007607100 in Runnemede, NJ reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,994. The severe-burden share is 53%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 2% Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units1,270
Renter share4.9%
SVI overall0.54
Poverty rate9.8%
Median income$110,804

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Runnemede
Very Low
Within county
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#84 of 129 tracts In Camden County
Low
Within state
32 th percentile
Rank, 32nd percentileLowHigh
#1,472 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Low
National
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#35,669 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Runnemede and the region

Centroid at 39.8503, -75.0852 · click any tract to drill in

Why Runnemede scores 4.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Runnemede
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
9.8% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$2,244 rent vs county FMR
7.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Runnemede
5.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Runnemede
6.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Runnemede
5.0

How Runnemede compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Runnemede risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.8This tracttract 6071005.5Runnemedeparent city5.7Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 54

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 78Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 15.14%Avg annual filing rate
  • 36.5%Peak (2014)
  • 15Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 34007607100
Filings climbed 50% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Runnemede

Average gross rent is $2,244, 58% above the Runnemede average. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.4/10. The voucher gap is 24.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

On the softer side, economic stress reads 2.5/10. On the high side, supply constraint reads 7.5/10. Cost burden runs 53% here against 48.5% across Camden County.

Against the Camden County average of 5.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.9 points. Court records carry 78 eviction filings across 6 observed years.

SNAP participation runs 7.7% against 15.2% nationally. Filings peaked in 2014 at 36.5% of renter households. In a typical year about 15.1% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 58% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 5% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the NJ average is 6.0, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 34007607100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007607100?

Census tract 34007607100 in Runnemede scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34007607100?

Median gross rent is $2,244/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34007607100?

9.8% of residents in tract 34007607100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,994.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34007607100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 54th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 54th, household 90th, minority 34th, housing 26th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007607100?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 78 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007607100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 15.14% of renter households, peaking at 36.5% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 34007607100 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 34007607100 compare to Runnemede overall?

Tract 34007607100 scores 4.8/10, lower than the parent city of Runnemede at 5.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Runnemede; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Runnemede

Top eight tracts in Runnemede ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related