Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #8,468 of 84,120 nationally

Runnemede Eviction Risk: High

Tract 34007607100 · Camden County, NJ · pop 3,994

Census tract 34007607100 belongs to Runnemede, New Jersey. It is home to 3,994 residents and scores $1/10, an elevated reading for landlords. That is riskier than about 94% of US census tracts.

53% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 53% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,244 a month against an average household income of $110,804 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. About 5% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1-10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 2% Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units1,270
Renter share4.9%
SVI overall0.54
Poverty rate9.8%
Median income$110,804

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileBottomTop
#2 of 2 tracts In Runnemede
Very Low
Within county
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileBottomTop
#90 of 129 tracts In Camden County
Low
Within state
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileBottomTop
#948 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Elevated
National
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileBottomTop
#8,468 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Runnemede and the region

Centroid at 39.8503, -75.0852 · click any tract to drill in

Why Runnemede scores 8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Runnemede
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
9.8% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$2,244 rent vs county FMR
7.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Runnemede
5.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Runnemede
6.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Runnemede
5.0

How Runnemede compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Runnemede risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.08.0This tracttract 607100Runnemede: 8.38.3Runnemedeparent cityCounty: 8.38.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.87.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 54

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Historic baseline (2000-2018)

  • 78Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 15.14%Avg annual filing rate
  • 36.5%Peak (2014)
  • 15Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 340076071002013: 10 filings (19.23/100 renter HHs)2014: 19 filings (36.54/100 renter HHs)2015: 9 filings (17.31/100 renter HHs)2016: 14 filings (6.22/100 renter HHs)2017: 11 filings (4.89/100 renter HHs)2018: 15 filings (6.67/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 50% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Runnemede

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 7.5/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Runnemede, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Camden County average of 6.8 and above the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 54th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 34007607100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007607100?

Census tract 34007607100 in Runnemede scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34007607100?

Median gross rent is $2,244/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34007607100?

9.8% of residents in tract 34007607100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,994.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34007607100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 54th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 54th, household 90th, minority 34th, housing 26th.

Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007607100?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 78 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007607100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 15.14% of renter households, peaking at 36.5% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

Q6

What share of households in tract 34007607100 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

Q7

How does tract 34007607100 compare to Runnemede overall?

Tract 34007607100 scores 8/10, lower than the parent city of Runnemede at 8.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Runnemede; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Runnemede

Top eight tracts in Runnemede ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related