Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,782 of 84,120 nationally

Port-au-Peck Eviction Risk: Elevated , Long Branch

Tract 34025805600 · Monmouth County, NJ · pop 2,582 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 34025805600 covers Port-au-Peck in Long Branch, home to 2,582 residents. For landlords it grades 7.2/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than roughly 96% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 55% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,322 a month against an average household income of $64,010 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 75% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 41% Stable renters 34% Owners 25%
Tract context
Occupied units823
Renter share75.0%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate19.9%
Median income$64,010

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 5 tracts In Port-au-Peck
High
Within parent city
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#3 of 8 tracts In Long Branch
Elevated
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 154 tracts In Monmouth County
Very High
Within state
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#386 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Long Branch and the region

Centroid at 40.3079, -73.9878 · click any tract to drill in

Why Port-au-Peck scores 7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Long Branch
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
19.9% poverty · this tract
5.0
Supply constraint
$1,322 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Long Branch
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Long Branch
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Long Branch
7.4

How Port-au-Peck compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Port-au-Peck risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.07.0This tracttract 805600Long Branch: 7.57.5Long Branchparent cityCounty: 3.13.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 192Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 16.03%Avg annual filing rate
  • 15.3%Peak (2013)
  • 90Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Port-au-Peck. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Port-au-Peck

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Long Branch eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Monmouth County average of 6.3 and above the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 26.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 16.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is Black and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 90th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 34025805600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34025805600?

Census tract 34025805600 in the Port-au-Peck neighborhood scores 7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34025805600?

Median gross rent is $1,322/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34025805600?

19.9% of residents in tract 34025805600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,582.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34025805600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 86th, household 97th, minority 89th, housing 54th.
Q5

Is tract 34025805600 considered part of Port-au-Peck?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34025805600 fall within Port-au-Peck (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34025805600?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 192 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 34025805600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 16.03% of renter households, peaking at 15.3% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 34025805600 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 34025805600 compare to Long Branch overall?

Tract 34025805600 scores 7/10, lower than the parent city of Long Branch at 7.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Long Branch eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Long Branch

Top eight tracts in Long Branch ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related