Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,878 of 84,120 nationally

Port-au-Peck Eviction Risk: Elevated , Long Branch

Tract 34025805700 · Monmouth County, NJ · pop 2,746 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

The Elevated-tier score of 6.7/10 for census tract 34025805700 reflects conditions in the Port-au-Peck area of Long Branch, New Jersey. That is riskier than roughly 90% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 40% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,484 monthly, set against $80,343 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 61% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25% Stable renters 36% Owners 39%
Tract context
Occupied units1,079
Renter share61.0%
SVI overall0.79
Poverty rate11.7%
Median income$80,343

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 5 tracts In Port-au-Peck
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 8 tracts In Long Branch
Very Low
Within county
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#16 of 154 tracts In Monmouth County
Very High
Within state
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#506 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Long Branch and the region

Centroid at 40.3027, -74.0003 · click any tract to drill in

Why Port-au-Peck scores 6.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Long Branch
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
11.7% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$1,484 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Long Branch
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Long Branch
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Long Branch
7.4

How Port-au-Peck compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Port-au-Peck risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.26.2This tracttract 805700Long Branch: 7.57.5Long Branchparent cityCounty: 3.13.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 86Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 7.79%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.7%Peak (2013)
  • 32Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Port-au-Peck. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Port-au-Peck

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Long Branch eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Monmouth County average of 6.3 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 86 eviction filings here over 2 tracked years, with about 7.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 8.7% of renter households in 2013.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 79th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 34025805700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34025805700?

Census tract 34025805700 in the Port-au-Peck neighborhood scores 6.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34025805700?

Median gross rent is $1,484/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34025805700?

11.7% of residents in tract 34025805700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,746.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34025805700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 69th, minority 76th, housing 57th.
Q5

Is tract 34025805700 considered part of Port-au-Peck?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34025805700 fall within Port-au-Peck (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34025805700?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 86 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 34025805700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.79% of renter households, peaking at 8.7% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 34025805700 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 34025805700 compare to Long Branch overall?

Tract 34025805700 scores 6.2/10, lower than the parent city of Long Branch at 7.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Long Branch eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Long Branch

Top eight tracts in Long Branch ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related