Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,153 of 84,120 nationally

Port-au-Peck Eviction Risk: High , Long Branch

Tract 34025805700 · Monmouth County, NJ · pop 2,746 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 34025805700 covers part of the Port-au-Peck area of Long Branch, NJ, and scores 8.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,746. Against the Monmouth County average of 5.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.9 points.

Risk score
8.6
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25% Stable renters 36% Owners 39%
Tract context
Occupied units1,079
Renter share61.0%
SVI overall0.79
Poverty rate11.7%
Median income$80,343

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 5 tracts In Port-au-Peck
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 8 tracts In Long Branch
Very Low
Within county
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#12 of 154 tracts In Monmouth County
Very High
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#259 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Long Branch and the region

Centroid at 40.3027, -74.0003 · click any tract to drill in

Why Port-au-Peck scores 8.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Long Branch
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
11.7% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$1,484 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Long Branch
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Long Branch
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Long Branch
7.4

How Port-au-Peck compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Port-au-Peck risk score vs. parent city / county / state8.6This tracttract 8057007.3Long Branchparent city5.7Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 86Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 7.79%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.7%Peak (2013)
  • 32Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Port-au-Peck. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Port-au-Peck

What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.6/10. 24% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.5/10.

Cost burden runs 40% here against 47.3% across Monmouth County. At $1,484 a month, rents run 21% under what the rest of Long Branch commands. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.3/10.

Adults with no health insurance runs 20.5% against 11.3% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 86 evictions over 2 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2013, when 8.7% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 7.8% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #5,153 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the NJ average is 6.0, so this tract runs 2.6 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 34025805700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34025805700?

Census tract 34025805700 in the Port-au-Peck neighborhood scores 8.6/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34025805700?

Median gross rent is $1,484/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34025805700?

11.7% of residents in tract 34025805700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,746.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34025805700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 69th, minority 76th, housing 57th.
Q5

Is tract 34025805700 considered part of Port-au-Peck?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34025805700 fall within Port-au-Peck (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34025805700?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 86 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 34025805700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.79% of renter households, peaking at 8.7% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 34025805700 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 34025805700 compare to Long Branch overall?

Tract 34025805700 scores 8.6/10, higher than the parent city of Long Branch at 7.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Long Branch eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Long Branch

Top eight tracts in Long Branch ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related