Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,219 of 84,120 nationally

Stone Water Eviction Risk: Elevated , Landing

Tract 34027045402 · Morris County, NJ · pop 5,787 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

How risky is the Stone Water neighborhood of Landing for landlords? Census tract 34027045402 scores 6.5/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 87% of US census tracts.

About 71% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 55% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,668 a month while the average household earns $100,478 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 23% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
7.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1-10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 6% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,991
Renter share22.5%
SVI overall0.30
Poverty rate10.2%
Median income$100,478

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileBottomTop
#1 of 2 tracts In Stone Water
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileBottomTop
#1 of 1 tracts In Landing
Moderate
Within county
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileBottomTop
#39 of 110 tracts In Morris County
Elevated
Within state
26 th percentile
Rank, 26th percentileBottomTop
#1,608 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Landing and the region

Centroid at 40.9071, -74.6686 · click any tract to drill in

Why Stone Water scores 7.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Landing
5.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.2
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
10.2% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,668 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Landing
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Landing
4.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Landing
7.3

How Stone Water compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Stone Water risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.17.1This tracttract 045402Landing: 7.17.1Landingparent cityCounty: 6.96.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.87.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 30

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Historic baseline (2000-2018)

  • 61Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 8.90%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.8%Peak (2017)
  • 24Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Stone Water. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Stone Water

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Landing, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Morris County average of 5.8 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 30th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 34027045402

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34027045402?

Census tract 34027045402 in the Stone Water neighborhood scores 7.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34027045402?

Median gross rent is $1,668/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 71% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34027045402?

10.2% of residents in tract 34027045402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,787.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34027045402?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 30th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 40th, household 66th, minority 53th, housing 8th.

Q5

Is tract 34027045402 considered part of Stone Water?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34027045402 fall within Stone Water (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).

Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34027045402?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 61 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 34027045402 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.90% of renter households, peaking at 10.8% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

Q7

What share of households in tract 34027045402 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

Q8

How does tract 34027045402 compare to Landing overall?

Tract 34027045402 scores 7.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Landing at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Landing; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Related