Census Tract · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally
Tract 34039033300 Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 34039033300 ·
Union County, NJ · pop 3,867
With a score of 5.1/10, tract 34039033300 in Union County, NJ reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,867 residents. 30% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Union County average of 44.6%.
Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 7%Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,409
Renter share10.1%
SVI overall0.27
Poverty rate4.8%
Median income$128,266
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
24th percentile
#91 of 120 tracts In Union County
Low
Within state
38th percentile
#1,350 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Low
National
63th percentile
#31,049 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Union County and the region
Centroid at 40.6849, -74.2675 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 34039033300 scores 5.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.8% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,917 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
State baseline
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Tract 34039033300 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 27
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
33%Socioeconomic
29%Household composition
73%Racial/ethnic minority
18%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
26%Grade A
1%Grade B
58%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
11.4%Housing insecurity
6.1%Utility-shutoff threat
11.8%Food insecurity
6.0%SNAP enrollment
6.3%Transit barriers
10.5%No health insurance
13.9%Frequent mental distress
21.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tract 34039033300
The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 8.9/10. The severe-burden share is 25%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.2/10. Against the Union County average of 6.6, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.5 points. SNAP participation runs 6.0% against 15.2% nationally.
Court records carry 19 eviction filings across 4 observed years. Filings peaked in 2013 at 3.9% of renter households.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 3.4% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 63% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
At 10% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.5/10.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 34039033300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34039033300?
Census tract 34039033300 in Union County scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34039033300?
Median gross rent is $1,917/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34039033300?
4.8% of residents in tract 34039033300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,867.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34039033300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 27th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 33th, household 29th, minority 73th, housing 18th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34039033300?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 19 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 34039033300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.41% of renter households, peaking at 3.9% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 34039033300 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
Was tract 34039033300 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.