Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,213 of 84,120 nationally

Alameda Eviction Risk: Moderate , North Valley

Tract 35001003600 · Bernalillo County, NM · pop 6,676 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

The Alameda neighborhood of North Valley anchors census tract 35001003600, which lands at 6.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 85% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

45% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,022 a month while the average household earns $63,696 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 30% of occupied homes.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 17% Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units2,654
Renter share30.0%
SVI overall0.68
Poverty rate26.3%
Median income$63,696

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Alameda
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In North Valley
Very High
Within county
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#45 of 176 tracts In Bernalillo County
Elevated
Within state
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#219 of 612 tracts In New Mexico
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across North Valley and the region

Centroid at 35.1929, -106.6231 · click any tract to drill in

Why Alameda scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from North Valley
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
New Mexico legislature & governorship
3.9
Economic stress
26.3% poverty · this tract
6.6
Supply constraint
$1,022 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from North Valley
3.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from North Valley
6.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from North Valley
5.9

How Alameda compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Alameda risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.25.2This tracttract 003600North Valley: 3.73.7North Valleyparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.64.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 68

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 879Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 14.06%Avg annual filing rate
  • 21.4%Peak (2000)
  • 24Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 350010036002000: 87 filings (21.44/100 renter HHs)2001: 53 filings (13.06/100 renter HHs)2002: 70 filings (17.25/100 renter HHs)2003: 62 filings (15.28/100 renter HHs)2004: 53 filings (13.06/100 renter HHs)2005: 69 filings (14.69/100 renter HHs)2006: 74 filings (15.75/100 renter HHs)2007: 55 filings (11.71/100 renter HHs)2008: 66 filings (14.05/100 renter HHs)2009: 63 filings (13.41/100 renter HHs)2010: 49 filings (9.42/100 renter HHs)2011: 47 filings (13.66/100 renter HHs)2012: 58 filings (16.86/100 renter HHs)2013: 49 filings (14.24/100 renter HHs)2014: 24 filings (6.98/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 72% over the past 15 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 160Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.73×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2020-03-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2020-06-01: 5 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 7 filings (2.62× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (1.15× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2021-05-01: 6 filings (2.58× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2021-10-01: 4 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-09-01: 8 filings (1.85× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.43× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2023-12-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (1.29× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (1.87× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (0.92× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Albuquerque, NM as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Alameda

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 6.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from North Valley eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Bernalillo County average of 6.1 and above the New Mexico statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.73x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

In CDC survey modeling, about 16.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 35001003600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 35001003600?

Census tract 35001003600 in the Alameda neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 35001003600?

Median gross rent is $1,022/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 35001003600?

26.3% of residents in tract 35001003600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,676.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 35001003600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 68th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 79th, minority 78th, housing 26th.
Q5

Is tract 35001003600 considered part of Alameda?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 35001003600 fall within Alameda (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 35001003600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 879 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 35001003600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.06% of renter households, peaking at 21.4% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 35001003600 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.73× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Albuquerque eviction risk, NM), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 35001003600 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 35001003600 compare to North Valley overall?

Tract 35001003600 scores 5.2/10, higher than the parent city of North Valley at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from North Valley eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in North Valley

Top eight tracts in North Valley ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related