Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,657 of 84,120 nationally

United Neighbors Together Eviction Risk: High , Rochester

Tract 36055008702 · Monroe County, NY · pop 1,524 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

36055008702 is a census tract in the United Neighbors Together area of Rochester, NY. It scores 9.5/10 for landlords. Population here is 1,524. 45% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
9.5
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 45% Stable renters 16% Owners 39%
Tract context
Occupied units635
Renter share60.6%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate51.1%
Median income$31,536

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In United Neighbors Together
Moderate
Within parent city
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#35 of 84 tracts In Rochester
Elevated
Within county
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#26 of 210 tracts In Monroe County
High
Within state
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#1,271 of 5,394 tracts In New York
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rochester and the region

Centroid at 43.1505, -77.6617 · click any tract to drill in

Why United Neighbors Together scores 9.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rochester
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
51.1% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$921 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rochester
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rochester
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rochester
7.0

How United Neighbors Together compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
United Neighbors Together risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.5This tracttract 0087028.1Rochesterparent city7.2Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 88

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in United Neighbors Together

about three-quarters of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the Monroe County average of 46.4%. What pushes it up most is economic stress at 10/10. SNAP participation runs 49.5% against 15.2% nationally.

The poverty rate is 51%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. It sits 2.3 points above the Monroe County average of 7.2. Housing insecurity runs 33.2% against 14.2% nationally.

Annualized rent equals 35% of average household income of $31,536, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.5/10.

On the high side, local political climate reads 7.5/10. At $921 a month, rents run 15% under what the rest of Rochester commands.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Rochester. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 97th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 36055008702

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36055008702?

Census tract 36055008702 in the United Neighbors Together neighborhood scores 9.5/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36055008702?

Median gross rent is $921/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 74% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36055008702?

51.1% of residents in tract 36055008702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,524.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36055008702?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 79th, household 98th, minority 82th, housing 61th.
Q5

Is tract 36055008702 considered part of United Neighbors Together?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36055008702 fall within United Neighbors Together (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36055008702 struggle to pay rent?

About 33.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 25.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36055008702 compare to Rochester overall?

Tract 36055008702 scores 9.5/10, higher than the parent city of Rochester at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rochester eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36055008702 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rochester

Top eight tracts in Rochester ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related