Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,571 of 84,120 nationally

Glen Oaks Eviction Risk: Elevated , North New Hyde Park

Tract 36059302600 · Nassau County, NY · pop 2,294 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 36059302600 covers part of the Glen Oaks area of Floral Park, NY, and scores 6.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,294. The severe-burden share is 32%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
6.3
Elevated
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 12% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units827
Renter share21.6%
SVI overall0.19
Poverty rate1.4%
Median income$124,583

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Glen Oaks
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In North New Hyde Park
Very High
Within county
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#112 of 281 tracts In Nassau County
Elevated
Within state
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#3,749 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across North New Hyde Park and the region

Centroid at 40.7319, -73.7019 · click any tract to drill in

Why Glen Oaks scores 6.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from North New Hyde Park
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
1.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,576 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from North New Hyde Park
8.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from North New Hyde Park
3.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from North New Hyde Park
5.7

How Glen Oaks compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Glen Oaks risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.3This tracttract 3026005.9North New Hyde Parparent city6.5Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 19

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Glen Oaks. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Glen Oaks

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.9/10. SNAP participation runs 5.6% against 15.2% nationally.

Sitting well above the midpoint, state political climate reads 7.3/10. Food insecurity runs 9.2% against 17.8% nationally.

At $2,576 a month, rents run 15% over what the rest of Floral Park commands. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Queens. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #16,571 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 22% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.7/10. Statewide the NY average is 7.7, so this tract runs 1.4 points cooler. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 1%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. 46% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the Nassau County average of 6.5 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 36059302600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36059302600?

Census tract 36059302600 in the Glen Oaks neighborhood scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36059302600?

Median gross rent is $2,576/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36059302600?

1.4% of residents in tract 36059302600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,294.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36059302600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 19th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 11th, household 29th, minority 60th, housing 29th.
Q5

Is tract 36059302600 considered part of Glen Oaks?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36059302600 fall within Glen Oaks (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36059302600 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36059302600 compare to North New Hyde Park overall?

Tract 36059302600 scores 6.3/10, higher than the parent city of North New Hyde Park at 5.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from North New Hyde Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36059302600 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in North New Hyde Park

Top eight tracts in North New Hyde Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related