Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #20,506 of 84,120 nationally

Crestwood Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tuckahoe

Tract 36119005100 · Westchester County, NY · pop 4,466 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Census tract 36119005100 covers part of the Crestwood area of Eastchester, NY, and scores 5.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,466. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 18% Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units1,758
Renter share41.8%
SVI overall0.48
Poverty rate4.0%
Median income$120,714

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Crestwood
Very Low
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Tuckahoe
Very High
Within county
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#194 of 241 tracts In Westchester County
Very Low
Within state
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#4,225 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tuckahoe and the region

Centroid at 40.9546, -73.8127 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crestwood scores 5.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tuckahoe
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.8
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
4.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,880 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tuckahoe
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tuckahoe
4.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tuckahoe
5.1

How Crestwood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crestwood risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.8This tracttract 0051008.2Tuckahoeparent city7.8Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 48

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Crestwood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crestwood

Against the Westchester County average of 7.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.0 points. Against Westchester County at 47.2%, 58% of renters here are cost-burdened. Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10.

19% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.8/10.

Food insecurity runs 8.2% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 5.9% against 15.2% nationally.

At $1,880 a month, rents run 15% under what the rest of Eastchester commands. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lower Westchester Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 76% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 5.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the NY average is 7.7, so this tract runs 1.9 points cooler.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 36119005100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36119005100?

Census tract 36119005100 in the Crestwood neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36119005100?

Median gross rent is $1,880/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36119005100?

4.0% of residents in tract 36119005100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,466.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36119005100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 48th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 61th, minority 42th, housing 65th.
Q5

Is tract 36119005100 considered part of Crestwood?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36119005100 fall within Crestwood (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36119005100 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36119005100 compare to Tuckahoe overall?

Tract 36119005100 scores 5.8/10, lower than the parent city of Tuckahoe at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tuckahoe; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36119005100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tuckahoe

Top eight tracts in Tuckahoe ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related