Crestwood Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tuckahoe
Tract 36119005100 · Westchester County, NY · pop 4,466 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Census tract 36119005100 covers part of the Crestwood area of Eastchester, NY, and scores 5.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,466. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Tuckahoe and the region
Centroid at 40.9546, -73.8127 · click any tract to drill in
Why Crestwood scores 5.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Crestwood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 48
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 31%Socioeconomic
- 61%Household composition
- 42%Racial/ethnic minority
- 65%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 31%Grade B
- 9%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Crestwood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.7%Housing insecurity
- 4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.2%Food insecurity
- 5.9%SNAP enrollment
- 4.7%Transit barriers
- 5.0%No health insurance
- 12.4%Frequent mental distress
- 21.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Crestwood
Against the Westchester County average of 7.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.0 points. Against Westchester County at 47.2%, 58% of renters here are cost-burdened. Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10.
19% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.8/10.
Food insecurity runs 8.2% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 5.9% against 15.2% nationally.
At $1,880 a month, rents run 15% under what the rest of Eastchester commands. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lower Westchester Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 76% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Social vulnerability reads 5.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the NY average is 7.7, so this tract runs 1.9 points cooler.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 36119005100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36119005100?
What is the average rent in tract 36119005100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 36119005100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 36119005100?
Is tract 36119005100 considered part of Crestwood?
What share of households in tract 36119005100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 36119005100 compare to Tuckahoe overall?
Was tract 36119005100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Tuckahoe
Top eight tracts in Tuckahoe ranked by composite eviction-risk score.