Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,571 of 84,120 nationally

Sun Haven Eviction Risk: Elevated , Larchmont

Tract 36119007100 · Westchester County, NY · pop 6,549 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

36119007100 is a census tract in the Sun Haven area of Larchmont, NY. It scores 6.3/10 for landlords. 66% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Westchester County average of 47.2%.

Risk score
6.3
Elevated
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 10% Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units2,552
Renter share30.4%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate2.0%
Median income$160,526

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Sun Haven
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Larchmont
Moderate
Within county
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#174 of 241 tracts In Westchester County
Low
Within state
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#3,749 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Larchmont and the region

Centroid at 40.9183, -73.7453 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sun Haven scores 6.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Larchmont
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.8
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
2.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,990 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Larchmont
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Larchmont
6.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Larchmont
5.0

How Sun Haven compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sun Haven risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.3This tracttract 0071007.6Larchmontparent city7.8Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 31

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sun Haven

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Against the Westchester County average of 7.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.5 points.

Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.9/10. Food insecurity runs 6.3% against 17.8% nationally. Severe burden reaches 11%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Adults with no health insurance runs 3.4% against 11.3% nationally. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lower Westchester Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

On the national scale it lands near the 80th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Rent consumes only 15% of average household income of $160,526, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the NY average is 7.7, so this tract runs 1.4 points cooler.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 36119007100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36119007100?

Census tract 36119007100 in the Sun Haven neighborhood scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36119007100?

Median gross rent is $1,990/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 66% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36119007100?

2.0% of residents in tract 36119007100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,549.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36119007100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 32th, household 15th, minority 31th, housing 57th.
Q5

Is tract 36119007100 considered part of Sun Haven?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36119007100 fall within Sun Haven (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36119007100 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36119007100 compare to Larchmont overall?

Tract 36119007100 scores 6.3/10, lower than the parent city of Larchmont at 7.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Larchmont; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36119007100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related