Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Muirfield Eviction Risk: Lower , Winston-Salem
Tract 37067002501 · Forsyth County, NC · pop 2,750 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Census tract 37067002501 covers part of the Muirfield area of Winston-Salem, NC, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,750 residents. Average gross rent is $1,582, 46% above the Winston-Salem average.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,121
Renter share14.7%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate2.7%
Median income$138,854
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
3
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
18
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
28
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Winston-Salem and the region
Centroid at 36.1044, -80.2829 · click any tract to drill in
Why Muirfield scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Winston-Salem
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
2.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,582 rent vs county FMR
8.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Winston-Salem
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Winston-Salem
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Winston-Salem
3.5
How Muirfield compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 6
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 23%Socioeconomic
- 7%Household composition
- 17%Racial/ethnic minority
- 9%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 72%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 9Total filings over 4 yrs
- 1.37%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.6%Peak (2006)
- 2Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Muirfield. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.2%Housing insecurity
- 2.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.4%Food insecurity
- 2.9%SNAP enrollment
- 3.2%Transit barriers
- 4.3%No health insurance
- 11.4%Frequent mental distress
- 22.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Muirfield
The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.5/10. The voucher gap is 36.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. Against Forsyth County at 41.1%, 53% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. Food insecurity runs 4.4% against 17.8% nationally. Severe burden reaches 16%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Housing insecurity runs 4.2% against 14.2% nationally. It sits 0.9 points below the Forsyth County average of 3.9.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 9 filings here across 4 tracked years. The worst year on record was 2006, when 2.6% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 1.4% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 37067002501
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37067002501?
Census tract 37067002501 in the Muirfield neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 37067002501?
Median gross rent is $1,582/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 37067002501?
2.7% of residents in tract 37067002501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,750.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 37067002501?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 23th, household 7th, minority 17th, housing 9th.
Q5
Is tract 37067002501 considered part of Muirfield?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37067002501 fall within Muirfield (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37067002501?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 9 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 37067002501 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.37% of renter households, peaking at 2.6% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 37067002501 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 37067002501 compare to Winston-Salem overall?
Tract 37067002501 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Winston-Salem at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Winston-Salem eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 37067002501 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Winston-Salem
Top eight tracts in Winston-Salem ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NC
Tower Gate
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
37067000400
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Kingsberry Park
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
37067000500
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Wake Forest Innovation Quarter
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Weston
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Wake Forest Innovation Quarter
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Wake Forest Innovation Quarter
5
/ 10 · Moderate
Related