Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,095 of 84,120 nationally
Hillsdale Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Greensboro
Tract 37081011601 · Guilford County, NC · pop 3,112 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
With a score of 5.3/10, tract 37081011601 in the Hillsdale Park area of Greensboro, NC reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,112. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.5/10.
Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21%
Stable renters 29%
Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units1,089
Renter share50.1%
SVI overall0.76
Poverty rate26.6%
Median income$52,543
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
77
th percentile
High
Within county
99
th percentile
Very High
Within state
86
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Greensboro and the region
Centroid at 36.0536, -79.8234 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hillsdale Park scores 5.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Greensboro
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
26.6% poverty · this tract
6.7
Supply constraint
$1,098 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Greensboro
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Greensboro
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Greensboro
3.5
How Hillsdale Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 76
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 96%Socioeconomic
- 42%Household composition
- 82%Racial/ethnic minority
- 36%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 49%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 421Total filings over 5 yrs
- 17.07%Avg annual filing rate
- 22.4%Peak (2016)
- 102Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 31% over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 29.1%Housing insecurity
- 21.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 40.6%Food insecurity
- 39.8%SNAP enrollment
- 20.9%Transit barriers
- 22.6%No health insurance
- 22.8%Frequent mental distress
- 47.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hillsdale Park
Food insecurity runs 40.6% against 17.8% nationally. Severe burden reaches 28%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10. Housing insecurity runs 29.1% against 14.2% nationally.
The poverty rate is 27%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Against the Guilford County average of 4.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.3/10.
Court records carry 421 eviction filings across 5 observed years. The worst year on record was 2016, when 22.4% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 17.1% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 67% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.9/10.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 37081011601
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37081011601?
Census tract 37081011601 in the Hillsdale Park neighborhood scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 37081011601?
Median gross rent is $1,098/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 37081011601?
26.6% of residents in tract 37081011601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,112.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 37081011601?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 76th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 42th, minority 82th, housing 36th.
Q5
Is tract 37081011601 considered part of Hillsdale Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37081011601 fall within Hillsdale Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37081011601?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 421 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 37081011601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 17.07% of renter households, peaking at 22.4% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 37081011601 struggle to pay rent?
About 29.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 21.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 37081011601 compare to Greensboro overall?
Tract 37081011601 scores 5.3/10, higher than the parent city of Greensboro at 3.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Greensboro eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 37081011601 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Greensboro
Top eight tracts in Greensboro ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NC
Nocho Park
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Oakwood
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
37081010300
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Clinton Hills
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Oak Grove
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Warnersville
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Glendale Oaks
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Latham Town
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Related