Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,095 of 84,120 nationally
Latham Town Eviction Risk: Moderate , Greensboro
Tract 37081011602 · Guilford County, NC · pop 2,657 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Census tract 37081011602 covers part of the Latham Town area of Greensboro, NC, and scores 5.3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,657. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.5/10.
Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20%
Stable renters 33%
Owners 47%
Tract context
Occupied units1,038
Renter share53.1%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate26.7%
Median income$44,337
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
64
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
98
th percentile
Very High
Within state
86
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Greensboro and the region
Centroid at 36.0529, -79.8436 · click any tract to drill in
Why Latham Town scores 5.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Greensboro
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
26.7% poverty · this tract
6.7
Supply constraint
$1,087 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Greensboro
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Greensboro
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Greensboro
3.5
How Latham Town compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 88
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 85%Socioeconomic
- 77%Household composition
- 81%Racial/ethnic minority
- 80%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 11%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 631Total filings over 5 yrs
- 21.74%Avg annual filing rate
- 26.1%Peak (2005)
- 135Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 25.1%Housing insecurity
- 16.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 32.5%Food insecurity
- 28.8%SNAP enrollment
- 16.4%Transit barriers
- 21.2%No health insurance
- 20.0%Frequent mental distress
- 41.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Latham Town
24% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10.
Food insecurity runs 32.5% against 17.8% nationally. The poverty rate is 27%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. It sits 1.3 points above the Guilford County average of 4.0.
Cost burden runs 38% here against 44.7% across Guilford County. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.3/10.
Adults with no health insurance runs 21.2% against 11.3% nationally. Court records carry 631 eviction filings across 5 observed years.
Filings peaked in 2005 at 26.1% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 21.7% of renter households face a filing.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 37081011602
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37081011602?
Census tract 37081011602 in the Latham Town neighborhood scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 37081011602?
Median gross rent is $1,087/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 37081011602?
26.7% of residents in tract 37081011602 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,657.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 37081011602?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 77th, minority 81th, housing 80th.
Q5
Is tract 37081011602 considered part of Latham Town?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37081011602 fall within Latham Town (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37081011602?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 631 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 37081011602 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 21.74% of renter households, peaking at 26.1% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 37081011602 struggle to pay rent?
About 25.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 37081011602 compare to Greensboro overall?
Tract 37081011602 scores 5.3/10, higher than the parent city of Greensboro at 3.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Greensboro eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 37081011602 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Greensboro
Top eight tracts in Greensboro ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NC
Oakwood
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
37081010602
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Pomona
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
King's Pond
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Woodberry Forest
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Warnersville
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Coventry Glen
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Nocho Park
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Related