Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally

Lagonda Eviction Risk: Lower , Springfield

Tract 39023001600 · Clark County, OH · pop 3,556 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

39023001600 is a census tract in the Lagonda area of Springfield, OH. It scores 3.3/10 for landlords. It is home to 3,556 residents. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 8.9/10.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 12% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,359
Renter share22.6%
SVI overall0.34
Poverty rate9.7%
Median income$79,647

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Lagonda
Very Low
Within parent city
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#25 of 27 tracts In Springfield
Very Low
Within county
32 th percentile
Rank, 32nd percentileLowHigh
#31 of 45 tracts In Clark County
Low
Within state
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#1,963 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Springfield and the region

Centroid at 39.9262, -83.7527 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lagonda scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Springfield
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
9.7% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$893 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Springfield
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Springfield
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Springfield
7.0

How Lagonda compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lagonda risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.3This tracttract 0016004.2Springfieldparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 34

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 93Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 4.81%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.1%Peak (2005)
  • 15Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 39023001600
Filings climbed 15% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lagonda. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lagonda

Severe burden reaches 21%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.9/10. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8/10.

Cost burden runs 45% here against 39.6% across Clark County. Against the Clark County average of 4.2, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.9 points.

Court records carry 93 eviction filings across 6 observed years. Filings peaked in 2005 at 6.1% of renter households.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 4.8% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 27% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 23% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 39023001600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39023001600?

Census tract 39023001600 in the Lagonda neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39023001600?

Median gross rent is $893/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39023001600?

9.7% of residents in tract 39023001600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,556.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39023001600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 34th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 45th, minority 10th, housing 35th.
Q5

Is tract 39023001600 considered part of Lagonda?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39023001600 fall within Lagonda (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39023001600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 93 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 39023001600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.81% of renter households, peaking at 6.1% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 39023001600 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 39023001600 compare to Springfield overall?

Tract 39023001600 scores 3.3/10, lower than the parent city of Springfield at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Springfield eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 39023001600 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Springfield

Top eight tracts in Springfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related