Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Lyndhurst Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 39035170202 · Cuyahoga County, OH · pop 3,966
With a score of 3/10, tract 39035170202 in Lyndhurst, OH reads lower for landlord eviction risk. 29% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%
Stable renters 12%
Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units1,976
Renter share23.6%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate1.8%
Median income$89,194
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
15
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
31
th percentile
Low
National
20
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lyndhurst and the region
Centroid at 41.5096, -81.4794 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lyndhurst scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Lyndhurst
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
1.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,591 rent vs county FMR
8.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lyndhurst
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lyndhurst
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lyndhurst
4.4
How Lyndhurst compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 17
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 8%Socioeconomic
- 28%Household composition
- 19%Racial/ethnic minority
- 48%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 47%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 67Total filings over 11 yrs
- 3.10%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.4%Peak (2010)
- 9Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 80% over the past 12 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.2%Housing insecurity
- 4.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.8%Food insecurity
- 4.7%SNAP enrollment
- 4.2%Transit barriers
- 4.8%No health insurance
- 12.2%Frequent mental distress
- 24.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lyndhurst
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. The voucher gap is 31.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. At $1,591 a month, rents run 28% over what the rest of Lyndhurst commands.
Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.2/10. Against the Cuyahoga County average of 4.6, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.6 points.
Sitting well above the midpoint, supply constraint reads 8.2/10. SNAP participation runs 4.7% against 15.2% nationally.
Against Cuyahoga County at 43.0%, 48% of renters here are cost-burdened. The filing record is not thin: 67 evictions over 11 years of observation.
Housing insecurity runs 6.2% against 14.2% nationally. Filings peaked in 2010 at 2.4% of renter households.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 39035170202
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39035170202?
Census tract 39035170202 in Lyndhurst scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39035170202?
Median gross rent is $1,591/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39035170202?
1.8% of residents in tract 39035170202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,966.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39035170202?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 28th, minority 19th, housing 48th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39035170202?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 67 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 39035170202 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.10% of renter households, peaking at 2.4% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 39035170202 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 39035170202 compare to Lyndhurst overall?
Tract 39035170202 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Lyndhurst at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lyndhurst; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 39035170202 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Lyndhurst
Top eight tracts in Lyndhurst ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related