Natural Resources Park District Eviction Risk: Moderate
2 census tracts · pop 3,369 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 5.7/10 · range 5.7–5.7
Natural Resources Park District spans 2 census tracts of Columbus, OH and houses 3,369 people. The Eviction Risk Score is 5.7/10, in the Moderate tier. 30.3% of adults report being unable to pay a utility bill, against a 9.2% national figure. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
Food insecurity affects 47.3% of adults, 29.5 points above the national rate. The poverty rate is 42%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than the filing statistics suggest. The dominant input is economic stress at 9.3/10.
At $887 a month, rents sit 32% under what the rest of Columbus commands. 22% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate. Well under the midpoint is rent-regulation exposure, at 1.5/10.
Cost burden runs 37% against 28.8% citywide, putting Natural Resources Park District 7.8% over its own city. Running cool is supply constraint, at 1.6/10. Court records carry 1,422 eviction filings across its 2 observed tracts.
The worst year on record was 2009, when filings touched 20.4% of renter households. The most recent observed rate, 10.4% in 2015, is well off that peak. Among the 120 mapped neighborhoods of Columbus, it ranks #3 by risk, the upper third.
The closest comparables inside the same city are Eastwood Heights and Homedale Addition.
With little internal variation, 5.7/10 is a fair proxy for any address inside the boundary. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.
Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk
Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Risk heat across Natural Resources Park District and the region
Click any tract to drill in · 2 tracts span score 5.7–5.7
Why Natural Resources Park District scores 5.7
9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendlyNatural Resources Park District vs. parent city, state, U.S.
Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).
2 tracts in Natural Resources Park District
Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.
| Tract↕ | Score↕ | Pop↕ | % over 30% on rent↕ | Average rent↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39049001500 | 5.7 | 1,922 | 19% | $755 |
| 39049001400 | 5.7 | 1,447 | 59% | $1,063 |
CDC SVI percentile: 92
Pop-weighted across 2 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.
Court-record eviction history in Natural Resources Park District
Aggregated across 2 validated constituent tracts. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,422Total filings (sum)
- 14.47%Avg annual filing rate
- 20.4%Peak year (2009)
- 10.34%Latest filed (2015)
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 626Total filings 2020-21
- 4.1Avg monthly observed
- 4.4Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.94×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Tracked under Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Columbus, OH).
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Natural Resources Park District
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
- 34.7%Housing insecurity
- 30.2%Utility shutoff threat
- 47.0%Food insecurity
- 49.5%SNAP enrollment
- 15.5%No health insurance
- 40.8%Any disability
About Natural Resources Park District
How does Natural Resources Park District compare to Columbus overall?
What is the average rent in Natural Resources Park District?
What percentage of Natural Resources Park District residents are renters?
Is Natural Resources Park District a high social-vulnerability area?
Which tracts in Natural Resources Park District have the highest eviction risk?
How safe is Natural Resources Park District for landlords?
What is the demographic breakdown of Natural Resources Park District?
Other neighborhoods near Natural Resources Park District
Other neighborhoods inside Columbus
Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Natural Resources Park District.