Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,316 of 84,120 nationally

Natural Resources Park District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Columbus

Tract 39049001400 · Franklin County, OH · pop 1,447 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

The Elevated-tier score of 6.2/10 for census tract 39049001400 reflects conditions in the Natural Resources Park District area of Columbus, Ohio. That is riskier than about 80% of US census tracts.

59% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,063 a month while the average household earns $32,243 a year, roughly 40% of income at the averages. About 67% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 40% Stable renters 27% Owners 33%
Tract context
Occupied units543
Renter share66.7%
SVI overall0.87
Poverty rate33.1%
Median income$32,243

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Natural Resources Park District
Very High
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#41 of 238 tracts In Columbus
High
Within county
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#41 of 328 tracts In Franklin County
High
Within state
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#228 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Columbus and the region

Centroid at 39.9952, -82.9871 · click any tract to drill in

Why Natural Resources Park District scores 5.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Columbus
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
33.1% poverty · this tract
8.3
Supply constraint
$1,063 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Columbus
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Columbus
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Columbus
4.0

How Natural Resources Park District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Natural Resources Park District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.85.8This tracttract 001400Columbus: 3.13.1Columbusparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 87

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 695Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 18.90%Avg annual filing rate
  • 19.8%Peak (2002)
  • 47Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390490014002002: 69 filings (19.82/100 renter HHs)2003: 54 filings (15.51/100 renter HHs)2004: 52 filings (14.94/100 renter HHs)2005: 54 filings (26.33/100 renter HHs)2006: 50 filings (24.38/100 renter HHs)2007: 53 filings (25.85/100 renter HHs)2008: 64 filings (31.21/100 renter HHs)2009: 64 filings (31.21/100 renter HHs)2010: 54 filings (15.25/100 renter HHs)2011: 51 filings (11.59/100 renter HHs)2012: 40 filings (9.09/100 renter HHs)2013: 43 filings (9.77/100 renter HHs)2015: 47 filings (10.68/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 32% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 316Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.7Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.11×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 4 filings (1.72× baseline)2020-02-01: 6 filings (2.25× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-09-01: 4 filings (0.92× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2020-11-01: 3 filings (2.26× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (0.53× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (1.29× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (1.29× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2021-08-01: 11 filings (2.20× baseline)2021-09-01: 5 filings (1.15× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (1.39× baseline)2021-11-01: 6 filings (4.51× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2022-01-01: 7 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (1.29× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2022-04-01: 6 filings (1.28× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-09-01: 7 filings (1.62× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (1.15× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (3.01× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (1.72× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-03-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (1.36× baseline)2023-07-01: 6 filings (1.63× baseline)2023-08-01: 10 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 8 filings (1.85× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2023-11-01: 5 filings (3.76× baseline)2023-12-01: 7 filings (1.23× baseline)2024-01-01: 11 filings (4.72× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (1.87× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-04-01: 8 filings (1.71× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-06-01: 9 filings (2.45× baseline)2024-07-01: 8 filings (2.18× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 5 filings (3.76× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (1.06× baseline)2025-01-01: 10 filings (4.29× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (1.29× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-04-01: 7 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-05-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (1.09× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2025-10-01: 6 filings (1.39× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (0.53× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Columbus, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Natural Resources Park District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Natural Resources Park District

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 8.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Columbus eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Franklin County average of 5.4 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 695 eviction filings here over 13 tracked years, with about 18.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 19.8% of renter households in 2002.

Part of this tract, about 26% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39049001400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39049001400?

Census tract 39049001400 in the Natural Resources Park District neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39049001400?

Median gross rent is $1,063/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39049001400?

33.1% of residents in tract 39049001400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,447.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39049001400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 72th, minority 90th, housing 43th.
Q5

Is tract 39049001400 considered part of Natural Resources Park District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39049001400 fall within Natural Resources Park District (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39049001400?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 695 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 39049001400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 18.90% of renter households, peaking at 19.8% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39049001400 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.11× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Columbus eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39049001400 struggle to pay rent?

About 35.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 30.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39049001400 compare to Columbus overall?

Tract 39049001400 scores 5.8/10, higher than the parent city of Columbus at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Columbus eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 39049001400 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 26% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Columbus

Top eight tracts in Columbus ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related