Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #26,446 of 84,120 nationally

Evanston Eviction Risk: Moderate , Norwood

Tract 39061025600 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 3,624 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

For landlords sizing up the Evanston neighborhood of Norwood, census tract 39061025600 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of 6.7/10. On the national scale it ranks #8,642 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 61% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 30% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,137 a month against an average household income of $72,404 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 56% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 34% Stable renters 22% Owners 44%
Tract context
Occupied units1,402
Renter share55.9%
SVI overall0.28
Poverty rate28.2%
Median income$72,404

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Evanston
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 6 tracts In Norwood
Very High
Within county
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#63 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Elevated
Within state
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#736 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Norwood and the region

Centroid at 39.1512, -84.4637 · click any tract to drill in

Why Evanston scores 4.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Norwood
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
28.2% poverty · this tract
7.0
Supply constraint
$1,137 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Norwood
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Norwood
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Norwood
6.9

How Evanston compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Evanston risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.94.9This tracttract 025600Norwood: 2.72.7Norwoodparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 28

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 583Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 5.65%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.1%Peak (2006)
  • 22Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610256002002: 44 filings (6.04/100 renter HHs)2003: 38 filings (5.22/100 renter HHs)2004: 48 filings (6.59/100 renter HHs)2005: 45 filings (7.99/100 renter HHs)2006: 57 filings (10.12/100 renter HHs)2007: 41 filings (7.28/100 renter HHs)2008: 45 filings (7.99/100 renter HHs)2009: 40 filings (7.10/100 renter HHs)2010: 19 filings (2.64/100 renter HHs)2011: 33 filings (5.02/100 renter HHs)2012: 22 filings (3.35/100 renter HHs)2013: 33 filings (5.02/100 renter HHs)2014: 31 filings (4.72/100 renter HHs)2015: 21 filings (3.20/100 renter HHs)2016: 44 filings (5.44/100 renter HHs)2018: 22 filings (2.72/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 146Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.78×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.59× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 3 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (1.11× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.45× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (0.88× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (1.11× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.45× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (0.88× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (0.59× baseline)2023-08-01: 5 filings (1.56× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (1.47× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (1.11× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-04-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-05-01: 4 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (0.91× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (1.47× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (1.11× baseline)2025-02-01: 4 filings (2.22× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (1.18× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (0.59× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Evanston

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Norwood, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.78x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061025600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061025600?

Census tract 39061025600 in the Evanston neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061025600?

Median gross rent is $1,137/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061025600?

28.2% of residents in tract 39061025600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,624.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061025600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 28th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 43th, household 2th, minority 36th, housing 68th.
Q5

Is tract 39061025600 considered part of Evanston?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061025600 fall within Evanston (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061025600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 583 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061025600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.65% of renter households, peaking at 10.1% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061025600 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.78× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061025600 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061025600 compare to Norwood overall?

Tract 39061025600 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Norwood at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Norwood; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Norwood

Top eight tracts in Norwood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related