Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,578 of 84,120 nationally

Oakley Eviction Risk: Moderate , Norwood

Tract 39061025300 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 2,775 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Tract 39061025300 covers the Oakley neighborhood of Norwood in Ohio. Home to 2,775 residents, it scores 6.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #13,201 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 52% of renter households, a severe level, and 40% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $851 a month against an average household income of $62,230 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 53% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27% Stable renters 26% Owners 47%
Tract context
Occupied units1,355
Renter share52.8%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate23.9%
Median income$62,230

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Oakley
Very High
Within parent city
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 6 tracts In Norwood
High
Within county
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#70 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Elevated
Within state
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#839 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Norwood and the region

Centroid at 39.1661, -84.4438 · click any tract to drill in

Why Oakley scores 4.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Norwood
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
23.9% poverty · this tract
6.0
Supply constraint
$851 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Norwood
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Norwood
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Norwood
6.9

How Oakley compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Oakley risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.74.7This tracttract 025300Norwood: 2.72.7Norwoodparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 47

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,017Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 9.96%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.2%Peak (2003)
  • 28Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610253002002: 65 filings (9.84/100 renter HHs)2003: 87 filings (13.17/100 renter HHs)2004: 76 filings (11.51/100 renter HHs)2005: 68 filings (13.08/100 renter HHs)2006: 66 filings (12.70/100 renter HHs)2007: 69 filings (13.27/100 renter HHs)2008: 62 filings (11.93/100 renter HHs)2009: 75 filings (14.43/100 renter HHs)2010: 79 filings (12.74/100 renter HHs)2011: 55 filings (6.68/100 renter HHs)2012: 59 filings (7.17/100 renter HHs)2013: 79 filings (9.60/100 renter HHs)2014: 45 filings (5.47/100 renter HHs)2015: 50 filings (6.08/100 renter HHs)2016: 54 filings (7.69/100 renter HHs)2018: 28 filings (3.99/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 57% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 269Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.7Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.74×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (0.71× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (0.37× baseline)2020-10-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.37× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (0.91× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.81× baseline)2021-02-01: 5 filings (1.47× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (0.54× baseline)2021-06-01: 6 filings (1.07× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (0.54× baseline)2021-09-01: 7 filings (1.30× baseline)2021-10-01: 4 filings (0.74× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (0.91× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (1.47× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.26× baseline)2022-05-01: 10 filings (1.79× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (0.54× baseline)2022-07-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 9 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-10-01: 12 filings (2.22× baseline)2022-11-01: 6 filings (1.11× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (0.68× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2023-02-01: 6 filings (1.76× baseline)2023-03-01: 8 filings (2.22× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (0.79× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (0.54× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2023-07-01: 6 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 5 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (0.37× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (0.74× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (0.68× baseline)2024-01-01: 8 filings (1.29× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (1.47× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-04-01: 5 filings (1.32× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (0.54× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (0.54× baseline)2024-07-01: 6 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (0.74× baseline)2024-10-01: 7 filings (1.30× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (0.74× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (0.68× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2025-02-01: 5 filings (1.47× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (1.11× baseline)2025-04-01: 7 filings (1.84× baseline)2025-05-01: 3 filings (0.54× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-07-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (0.54× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (0.37× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (0.74× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Oakley. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Oakley

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Norwood, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.74x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

In CDC survey modeling, about 13.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061025300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061025300?

Census tract 39061025300 in the Oakley neighborhood scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061025300?

Median gross rent is $851/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061025300?

23.9% of residents in tract 39061025300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,775.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061025300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 53th, household 22th, minority 56th, housing 53th.
Q5

Is tract 39061025300 considered part of Oakley?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061025300 fall within Oakley (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061025300?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,017 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061025300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.96% of renter households, peaking at 13.2% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061025300 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.74× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061025300 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061025300 compare to Norwood overall?

Tract 39061025300 scores 4.7/10, higher than the parent city of Norwood at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Norwood; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Norwood

Top eight tracts in Norwood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related