Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally

Oakley Eviction Risk: Lower , Norwood

Tract 39061025401 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 1,422 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Census tract 39061025401 sits in the Oakley neighborhood of Norwood, Ohio eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.8/10. That is riskier than about 67% of US census tracts.

41% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $877 a month against an average household income of $68,500 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. Renters make up 59% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 35% Owners 41%
Tract context
Occupied units784
Renter share59.2%
SVI overall0.46
Poverty rate10.2%
Median income$68,500

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Oakley
Very Low
Within parent city
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Norwood
Low
Within county
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#119 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Moderate
Within state
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#1,450 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Norwood and the region

Centroid at 39.1588, -84.4501 · click any tract to drill in

Why Oakley scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Norwood
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
10.2% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$877 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Norwood
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Norwood
9.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Norwood
6.9

How Oakley compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Oakley risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 025401Norwood: 2.72.7Norwoodparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 46

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 371Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 5.01%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.3%Peak (2008)
  • 13Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610254012002: 24 filings (4.59/100 renter HHs)2003: 17 filings (3.25/100 renter HHs)2004: 23 filings (4.40/100 renter HHs)2005: 24 filings (6.06/100 renter HHs)2006: 30 filings (7.58/100 renter HHs)2007: 29 filings (7.32/100 renter HHs)2008: 33 filings (8.33/100 renter HHs)2009: 26 filings (6.57/100 renter HHs)2010: 24 filings (4.87/100 renter HHs)2011: 31 filings (5.82/100 renter HHs)2012: 18 filings (3.38/100 renter HHs)2013: 21 filings (3.94/100 renter HHs)2014: 24 filings (4.50/100 renter HHs)2015: 22 filings (4.13/100 renter HHs)2016: 12 filings (2.56/100 renter HHs)2018: 13 filings (2.78/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 46% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 92Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.76×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (1.43× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (1.43× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (1.88× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (1.11× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (1.43× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-02-01: 3 filings (2.14× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.71× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (0.71× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (1.43× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (2.14× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (1.88× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (2.14× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (2.14× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Oakley. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Oakley

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Norwood, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 371 eviction filings here over 16 tracked years, with about 5.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 8.3% of renter households in 2008.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.76x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061025401

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061025401?

Census tract 39061025401 in the Oakley neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061025401?

Median gross rent is $877/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061025401?

10.2% of residents in tract 39061025401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,422.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061025401?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 46th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 72th, household 12th, minority 24th, housing 47th.
Q5

Is tract 39061025401 considered part of Oakley?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061025401 fall within Oakley (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061025401?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 371 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061025401 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.01% of renter households, peaking at 8.3% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061025401 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.76× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061025401 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061025401 compare to Norwood overall?

Tract 39061025401 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Norwood at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Norwood; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Norwood

Top eight tracts in Norwood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related