Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #80,791 of 84,120 nationally
Dry Run Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 39061025101 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 4,748
The Moderate-tier score of 4.2/10 for census tract 39061025101 reflects conditions in Dry Run, Ohio. On the national scale it ranks #71,075 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 19% of renter households, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $154,023 a year. Renters make up 4% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%
Stable renters 3%
Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units1,583
Renter share3.7%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate4.5%
Median income$154,023
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
4
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
5
th percentile
Very Low
National
4
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Dry Run and the region
Centroid at 39.0987, -84.3234 · click any tract to drill in
Why Dry Run scores 1.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Dry Run
3.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
4.5% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dry Run
4.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dry Run
1.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dry Run
3.6
How Dry Run compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 1
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 2%Socioeconomic
- 14%Household composition
- 25%Racial/ethnic minority
- 2%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 42Total filings over 12 yrs
- 13.16%Avg annual filing rate
- 66.7%Peak (2007)
- 4Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 16 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 1Total filings 2020-21
- 0.0Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.1Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.09×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.1%Housing insecurity
- 4.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.2%Food insecurity
- 4.4%SNAP enrollment
- 4.1%Transit barriers
- 4.2%No health insurance
- 14.3%Frequent mental distress
- 19.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Dry Run
What moves this score most is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Dry Run, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and below the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 1st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 42 eviction filings here over 12 tracked years, with about 13.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 66.7% of renter households in 2007.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 39061025101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061025101?
Census tract 39061025101 in Dry Run scores 1.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 39061025101?
4.5% of residents in tract 39061025101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,748.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 39061025101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 14th, minority 25th, housing 2th.
Q4
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061025101?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 42 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 39061025101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 13.16% of renter households, peaking at 66.7% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q5
Did eviction filings in tract 39061025101 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.09× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q6
What share of households in tract 39061025101 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 39061025101 compare to Dry Run overall?
Tract 39061025101 scores 1.3/10, lower than the parent city of Dry Run at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dry Run; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related