Skip to content
Neighborhood · Kenwood, OH

Raider’s Run Eviction Risk: Lower

2 census tracts · pop 8,387 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 1.4/10 · range 1.3–1.7

Raider’s Run is a white (non-hispanic) neighborhood in Kenwood with 2 census tracts and a population of 8,387 residents. The neighborhood's pop-weighted eviction-risk score of 1.4/10 (Lower tier) blends state law, county-level filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty. 43% of renters here pay at least 30% of household income on rent, and 23% are severely cost-burdened (≥50% of income). Average gross rent of $1,866/month sits 6% lower than the Kenwood citywide average ($1,986).

Risk score
1.4
Lower
2 tracts · population-weighted
Raider’s Run vs Kenwood How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
42.9% +31%
Kenwood: 32.7%
Average gross rent
$1,866 -6%
Kenwood: $1,986
Average HH income
$127,436 +21%
Kenwood: $105,694
Poverty rate
3.7% -40%
Kenwood: 6.1%
Renter share
15.9% -58%
Kenwood: 38.3%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Raider’s Run and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 2 tracts span score 1.3–1.7

Why Raider’s Run scores 1.4

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 2.4–2.4 across tracts
2.4
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 5.8–5.8 across tracts
5.8
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 6.2–6.2 across tracts
6.2
Rent control risk
43% of income on rent · Range 4.4–7.9 across tracts
5.7
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 1.9–2.5 across tracts
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
16% renter households · Range 3.0–7.5 across tracts
4.7
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 3.3–5.8 across tracts
4.2
Economic stress
3.7% below poverty line · Range 1.0–1.1 across tracts
1.1
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 9.1–10.0 across tracts
9.4
Risk score comparison

Raider’s Run vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Raider’s Run score vs. parent city, state, U.S.Raider’s Run: 1.41.4Raider’s RunNeighborhoodParent city: 2.92.9Parent cityhost cityState: 2.82.8Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

2 tracts in Raider’s Run

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
39061024002 1.7 3,144 76% $1,942
39061023902 1.3 5,243 23% $1,820
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 21

Pop-weighted across 2 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 12%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 36%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 29%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 38%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history in Raider’s Run

Aggregated across 2 validated constituent tracts. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 73Total filings (sum)
  • 0.96%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.2%Peak year (2018)
  • 1.40%Latest filed (2018)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 83Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.6Avg monthly observed
  • 0.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 4.18×Ratio to baseline

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Tracked under Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati, OH).

CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Raider’s Run

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Raider’s Run

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Raider’s Run?

Raider’s Run scores 1.4/10 (Lower tier) across 2 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Raider’s Run compare to Kenwood overall?

Raider’s Run scores 1.5 points lower than Kenwood overall (2.9/10). Renters spend 43% of income on rent vs 33% citywide. Average rent: $1,866 vs $1,986.
Q3

What is the average rent in Raider’s Run?

Average gross rent in Raider’s Run is $1,866/month (pop-weighted across 2 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Raider’s Run residents are renters?

16% of Raider’s Run households are renter-occupied (vs 38% in Kenwood). The neighborhood has 8,387 residents.
Q5

Is Raider’s Run a high social-vulnerability area?

Raider’s Run sits in the 21st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (low vulnerability). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

Which tracts in Raider’s Run have the highest eviction risk?

The highest-risk constituent tract in Raider’s Run is census tract 39061024002 (score 1.7/10). Across the 2 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 1.3 to 1.7, a spread of 0.4 points.
Q7

How safe is Raider’s Run for landlords?

Raider’s Run carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (1.4/10). Pop-weighted across 2 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Kenwood as a whole (2.9/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q8

What is the demographic breakdown of Raider’s Run?

Raider’s Run has 8,280 residents (White (non-Hispanic) Neighborhood). Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (81.4%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (6.1%), Other / Multiracial (5.4%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Raider’s Run

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further