Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Census Tract · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally
Pataskala Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 39089755901 · Licking County, OH · pop 5,203
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 39089755901 (Pataskala, Ohio) comes in at 4.5/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 22% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 31% of renter households, a high level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $95,000 a year. About 10% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 90%
Tract context
Occupied units1,808
Renter share9.7%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate0.6%
Median income$95,000
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
20
th percentile
Low
Within state
13
th percentile
Very Low
National
11
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Pataskala and the region
Centroid at 40.0300, -82.7589 · click any tract to drill in
Why Pataskala scores 1.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Pataskala
4.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
0.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pataskala
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pataskala
5.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pataskala
4.1
How Pataskala compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 24
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 25%Socioeconomic
- 42%Household composition
- 49%Racial/ethnic minority
- 19%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.6%Housing insecurity
- 7.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.0%Food insecurity
- 9.2%SNAP enrollment
- 6.8%Transit barriers
- 6.8%No health insurance
- 17.0%Frequent mental distress
- 25.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Pataskala
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 5.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pataskala, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Licking County average of 4.8 and below the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 10.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 24th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 39089755901
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39089755901?
Census tract 39089755901 in Pataskala scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 39089755901?
0.6% of residents in tract 39089755901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,203.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 39089755901?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 42th, minority 49th, housing 19th.
Q4
What share of households in tract 39089755901 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q5
How does tract 39089755901 compare to Pataskala overall?
Tract 39089755901 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Pataskala at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pataskala; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Pataskala
Top eight tracts in Pataskala ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related