Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally

Pataskala Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 39089756801 · Licking County, OH · pop 4,325 · 71% of tract blocks fall in Pataskala

Eviction risk in Pataskala in Licking County centers on tract 39089756801, which scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 4,325 residents. That is riskier than about 20% of US census tracts.

About 21% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 7% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,413 a month while the average household earns $87,749 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 59% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 47% Owners 40%
Tract context
Occupied units1,761
Renter share59.2%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate10.1%
Median income$87,749

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Pataskala
Very High
Within county
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#25 of 46 tracts In Licking County
Moderate
Within state
26 th percentile
Rank, 26th percentileLowHigh
#2,348 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Low
National
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#66,742 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pataskala and the region

Centroid at 39.9909, -82.6645 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pataskala scores 2.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pataskala
4.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
10.1% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,413 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pataskala
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pataskala
5.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pataskala
4.1

How Pataskala compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pataskala risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.52.5This tracttract 756801Pataskala: 2.32.3Pataskalaparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 62

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pataskala

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 5.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pataskala, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Licking County average of 4.8 and below the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 62nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39089756801

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39089756801?

Census tract 39089756801 in Pataskala scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39089756801?

Median gross rent is $1,413/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 21% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39089756801?

10.1% of residents in tract 39089756801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,325.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39089756801?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 33th, household 88th, minority 33th, housing 78th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 39089756801 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 39089756801 compare to Pataskala overall?

Tract 39089756801 scores 2.5/10, right in line with the parent city of Pataskala at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pataskala; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pataskala

Top eight tracts in Pataskala ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related