Pataskala Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 39089756801 · Licking County, OH · pop 4,325 · 71% of tract blocks fall in Pataskala
Eviction risk in Pataskala in Licking County centers on tract 39089756801, which scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 4,325 residents. That is riskier than about 20% of US census tracts.
About 21% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 7% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,413 a month while the average household earns $87,749 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 59% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Pataskala and the region
Centroid at 39.9909, -82.6645 · click any tract to drill in
Why Pataskala scores 2.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Pataskala compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 62
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 33%Socioeconomic
- 88%Household composition
- 33%Racial/ethnic minority
- 78%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.2%Housing insecurity
- 8.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.7%Food insecurity
- 11.5%SNAP enrollment
- 7.6%Transit barriers
- 7.7%No health insurance
- 18.4%Frequent mental distress
- 30.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Pataskala
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 5.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pataskala, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Licking County average of 4.8 and below the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 11.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 62nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 39089756801
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39089756801?
What is the average rent in tract 39089756801?
What is the poverty rate in tract 39089756801?
How socially vulnerable is tract 39089756801?
What share of households in tract 39089756801 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 39089756801 compare to Pataskala overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Pataskala
Top eight tracts in Pataskala ranked by composite eviction-risk score.