Neighborhood · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally
Piqua-Caldwell Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 39109315100 ·
Miami County, OH · pop 5,631 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Census tract 39109315100 sits in the Piqua-Caldwell Historic District neighborhood of Piqua, Ohio eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.4/10. That is riskier than roughly 52% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 65% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $882 a month while the average household earns $65,968 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 35% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23%Stable renters 12%Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units2,400
Renter share35.1%
SVI overall0.32
Poverty rate18.4%
Median income$65,968
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Piqua-Caldwell Historic District
Moderate
Within parent city
75th percentile
#2 of 5 tracts In Piqua
High
Within county
96th percentile
#2 of 23 tracts In Miami County
Very High
Within state
66th percentile
#1,081 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Piqua and the region
Centroid at 40.1564, -84.2533 · click any tract to drill in
Why Piqua-Caldwell Historic District scores 4.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Piqua
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
18.4% poverty · this tract
4.6
Supply constraint
$882 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Piqua
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Piqua
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Piqua
6.7
How Piqua-Caldwell Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 32
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
58%Socioeconomic
10%Household composition
10%Racial/ethnic minority
39%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
489Total filings over 9 yrs
5.77%Avg annual filing rate
7.6%Peak (2007)
44Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2003 to 2016
Filings dropped 28% over the past 9 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
13.6%Housing insecurity
10.0%Utility-shutoff threat
17.6%Food insecurity
15.6%SNAP enrollment
9.5%Transit barriers
9.5%No health insurance
20.4%Frequent mental distress
33.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Piqua-Caldwell Historic District
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 7.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Piqua, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Miami County average of 4.4 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 489 eviction filings here over 9 tracked years, with about 5.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 7.6% of renter households in 2007.
In CDC survey modeling, about 13.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 39109315100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39109315100?
Census tract 39109315100 in the Piqua-Caldwell Historic District neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39109315100?
Median gross rent is $882/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39109315100?
18.4% of residents in tract 39109315100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,631.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39109315100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 32th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 58th, household 10th, minority 10th, housing 39th.
Q5
Is tract 39109315100 considered part of Piqua-Caldwell Historic District?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39109315100 fall within Piqua-Caldwell Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39109315100?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 489 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 39109315100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.77% of renter households, peaking at 7.6% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39109315100 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39109315100 compare to Piqua overall?
Tract 39109315100 scores 4.3/10, higher than the parent city of Piqua at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Piqua; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Piqua
Top eight tracts in Piqua ranked by composite eviction-risk score.