Happy Hours Addition Eviction Risk: Moderate , Portsmouth
Tract 39145003000 · Scioto County, OH · pop 3,364 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Census tract 39145003000 covers part of the Happy Hours Addition area of Portsmouth, OH, and scores 4.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,364 residents. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.3/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Portsmouth and the region
Centroid at 38.7619, -82.8683 · click any tract to drill in
Why Happy Hours Addition scores 4.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Happy Hours Addition compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 46
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 64%Socioeconomic
- 65%Household composition
- 5%Racial/ethnic minority
- 25%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 8%Grade C
- 1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 247Total filings over 12 yrs
- 4.99%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.9%Peak (2010)
- 20Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.0%Housing insecurity
- 8.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 16.1%Food insecurity
- 14.2%SNAP enrollment
- 8.5%Transit barriers
- 8.8%No health insurance
- 21.1%Frequent mental distress
- 36.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Happy Hours Addition
29% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Sitting well above the midpoint, housing-court posture reads 8.5/10.
Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.1/10. Average gross rent is $899, 20% above the Portsmouth average.
Cost burden runs 50% here against 43.7% across Scioto County. The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
Court records carry 247 eviction filings across 12 observed years. The worst year on record was 2010, when 6.9% of renter households were served.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 5.0% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 53rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.1/10.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Scioto County average of 4.3 closely.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 39145003000
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39145003000?
What is the average rent in tract 39145003000?
What is the poverty rate in tract 39145003000?
How socially vulnerable is tract 39145003000?
Is tract 39145003000 considered part of Happy Hours Addition?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39145003000?
What share of households in tract 39145003000 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 39145003000 compare to Portsmouth overall?
Was tract 39145003000 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Portsmouth
Top eight tracts in Portsmouth ranked by composite eviction-risk score.