Sixth Street Historic District Eviction Risk: Elevated , Portsmouth
Tract 39145003700 · Scioto County, OH · pop 2,878 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
With a score of 6/10, tract 39145003700 in the Sixth Street Historic District area of Portsmouth, OH reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,878 residents. What pushes it up most is economic stress at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Portsmouth and the region
Centroid at 38.7477, -82.9893 · click any tract to drill in
Why Sixth Street Historic District scores 6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Sixth Street Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 84
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 86%Socioeconomic
- 65%Household composition
- 43%Racial/ethnic minority
- 86%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 4%Grade A
- 33%Grade B
- 21%Grade C
- 30%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 399Total filings over 12 yrs
- 5.12%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.4%Peak (2003)
- 22Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Sixth Street Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 20.4%Housing insecurity
- 17.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 29.8%Food insecurity
- 32.1%SNAP enrollment
- 15.7%Transit barriers
- 11.9%No health insurance
- 24.8%Frequent mental distress
- 43.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Sixth Street Historic District
The poverty rate is 51%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 9.3/10. SNAP participation runs 32.1% against 15.2% nationally.
Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.4/10. Against the Scioto County average of 4.3, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.7 points.
65% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Average gross rent is $563, 25% below the Portsmouth average.
Food insecurity runs 29.8% against 17.8% nationally. Court records carry 399 eviction filings across 12 observed years. Filings peaked in 2003 at 7.4% of renter households.
This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Portsmouth. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 5.1% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 78th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 39145003700
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39145003700?
What is the average rent in tract 39145003700?
What is the poverty rate in tract 39145003700?
How socially vulnerable is tract 39145003700?
Is tract 39145003700 considered part of Sixth Street Historic District?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39145003700?
What share of households in tract 39145003700 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 39145003700 compare to Portsmouth overall?
Was tract 39145003700 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Portsmouth
Top eight tracts in Portsmouth ranked by composite eviction-risk score.