Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally
Underwood Eviction Risk: Moderate , Cuyahoga Falls
Tract 39153520103 · Summit County, OH · pop 2,383 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
39153520103 is a census tract in the Underwood area of Cuyahoga Falls, OH. It scores 5.2/10 for landlords. It is home to 2,383 residents. roughly two in three of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the Summit County average of 41.2%.
Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36%
Stable renters 17%
Owners 47%
Tract context
Occupied units1,090
Renter share53.0%
SVI overall0.59
Poverty rate17.6%
Median income$50,443
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
92
th percentile
Very High
Within county
69
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
73
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cuyahoga Falls and the region
Centroid at 41.1230, -81.4782 · click any tract to drill in
Why Underwood scores 5.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
17.6% poverty · this tract
4.4
Supply constraint
$1,017 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.7
How Underwood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 59
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 56%Socioeconomic
- 65%Household composition
- 51%Racial/ethnic minority
- 51%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 9%Grade B
- 82%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 437Total filings over 17 yrs
- 4.80%Avg annual filing rate
- 8.7%Peak (2011)
- 29Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 45% over the past 17 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.7%Housing insecurity
- 9.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 17.1%Food insecurity
- 14.4%SNAP enrollment
- 9.2%Transit barriers
- 8.6%No health insurance
- 19.7%Frequent mental distress
- 32.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Underwood
The severe-burden share is 28%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Pulling hardest the other way is eviction-process difficulty at 2.1/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.4/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.6/10. Against the Summit County average of 4.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 437 filings here across 17 tracked years. The worst year on record was 2011, when 8.7% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 4.8% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #29,336 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.3/10.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 39153520103
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39153520103?
Census tract 39153520103 in the Underwood neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39153520103?
Median gross rent is $1,017/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39153520103?
17.6% of residents in tract 39153520103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,383.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39153520103?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 59th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 65th, minority 51th, housing 51th.
Q5
Is tract 39153520103 considered part of Underwood?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39153520103 fall within Underwood (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39153520103?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 437 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 39153520103 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.80% of renter households, peaking at 8.7% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39153520103 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39153520103 compare to Cuyahoga Falls overall?
Tract 39153520103 scores 5.2/10, higher than the parent city of Cuyahoga Falls at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cuyahoga Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 39153520103 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cuyahoga Falls
Top eight tracts in Cuyahoga Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · OH
West Village
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
East Village
4.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Weatherstone
4.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
North Village
4.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
North Village
4.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Berkshire Park Historic District
3.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OH
Hampton Bluff
3.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OH
Cross Creek
3.5
/ 10 · Low
Related