Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally

North Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Cuyahoga Falls

Tract 39153520600 · Summit County, OH · pop 3,694 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 39153520600 covers part of the North Village area of Cuyahoga Falls, OH, and scores 4.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. Against Summit County at 41.2%, around a third of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 16% Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units1,627
Renter share22.7%
SVI overall0.35
Poverty rate10.9%
Median income$70,486

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In North Village
Moderate
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 13 tracts In Cuyahoga Falls
Elevated
Within county
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#68 of 138 tracts In Summit County
Moderate
Within state
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#1,437 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cuyahoga Falls and the region

Centroid at 41.1546, -81.4756 · click any tract to drill in

Why North Village scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
10.9% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$897 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.7

How North Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
North Village risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.1This tracttract 5206004.0Cuyahoga Fallsparent city4.1Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 35

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 171Total filings over 17 yrs
  • 2.85%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.6%Peak (2013)
  • 12Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 39153520600
Filings climbed 71% over the past 17 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within North Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in North Village

21% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The clearest offset is eviction-process difficulty at 2.1/10.

On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.4/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.6/10.

Court records carry 171 eviction filings across 17 observed years. At $897 a month, rents run 14% under what the rest of Cuyahoga Falls commands. SNAP participation runs 8.2% against 15.2% nationally.

Filings peaked in 2013 at 4.6% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 2.9% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 44th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 23% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 4.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 39153520600

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39153520600?

Census tract 39153520600 in the North Village neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39153520600?

Median gross rent is $897/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39153520600?

10.9% of residents in tract 39153520600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,694.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39153520600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 39th, minority 26th, housing 35th.
Q5

Is tract 39153520600 considered part of North Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39153520600 fall within North Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39153520600?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 171 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 39153520600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.85% of renter households, peaking at 4.6% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 39153520600 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 39153520600 compare to Cuyahoga Falls overall?

Tract 39153520600 scores 4.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Cuyahoga Falls at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cuyahoga Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 39153520600 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cuyahoga Falls

Top eight tracts in Cuyahoga Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related