30% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $897 a month against an average household income of $70,486 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 23% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%Stable renters 16%Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units1,627
Renter share22.7%
SVI overall0.35
Poverty rate10.9%
Median income$70,486
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#2 of 3 tracts In North Village
Moderate
Within parent city
58th percentile
#6 of 13 tracts In Cuyahoga Falls
Elevated
Within county
45th percentile
#77 of 138 tracts In Summit County
Moderate
Within state
39th percentile
#1,935 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cuyahoga Falls and the region
Centroid at 41.1546, -81.4756 · click any tract to drill in
Why North Village scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
10.9% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$897 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.7
How North Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 35
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
42%Socioeconomic
39%Household composition
26%Racial/ethnic minority
35%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
38%Grade B
34%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
171Total filings over 17 yrs
2.85%Avg annual filing rate
4.6%Peak (2013)
12Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year2002 to 2018
Filings climbed 71% over the past 17 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within North Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
9.2%Housing insecurity
6.4%Utility-shutoff threat
10.9%Food insecurity
8.2%SNAP enrollment
6.2%Transit barriers
6.6%No health insurance
17.0%Frequent mental distress
29.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in North Village
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 7.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cuyahoga Falls eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Summit County average of 5.2 and in line with the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 171 eviction filings here over 17 tracked years, with about 2.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.6% of renter households in 2013.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 39153520600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39153520600?
Census tract 39153520600 in the North Village neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39153520600?
Median gross rent is $897/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39153520600?
10.9% of residents in tract 39153520600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,694.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39153520600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 39th, minority 26th, housing 35th.
Q5
Is tract 39153520600 considered part of North Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39153520600 fall within North Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39153520600?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 171 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 39153520600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.85% of renter households, peaking at 4.6% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39153520600 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39153520600 compare to Cuyahoga Falls overall?
Tract 39153520600 scores 3/10, higher than the parent city of Cuyahoga Falls at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cuyahoga Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 39153520600 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cuyahoga Falls
Top eight tracts in Cuyahoga Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.