Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Mustang Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 40017301406 · Canadian County, OK · pop 5,708 · 98% of tract blocks fall in Mustang

40017301406 is a census tract in Mustang, OK. It scores 3/10 for landlords. Population here is 5,708. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.2/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 14% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,893
Renter share19.9%
SVI overall0.29
Poverty rate4.9%
Median income$107,029

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Mustang
Low
Within county
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#26 of 37 tracts In Canadian County
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#781 of 1,205 tracts In Oklahoma
Low
National
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mustang and the region

Centroid at 35.3890, -97.6934 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mustang scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mustang
3.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.8
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
4.9% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,362 rent vs county FMR
6.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mustang
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mustang
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mustang
4.3

How Mustang compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mustang risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 3014063.4Mustangparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county3.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 29

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mustang

Against Canadian County at 39.2%, 28% of renters here are cost-burdened. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.7/10.

12% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The voucher gap is 15.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

SNAP participation runs 8.2% against 15.2% nationally. Against the Canadian County average of 3.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

At 20% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.6/10. Rent consumes only 15% of average household income of $107,029, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 40017301406

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40017301406?

Census tract 40017301406 in Mustang scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 40017301406?

Median gross rent is $1,362/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 40017301406?

4.9% of residents in tract 40017301406 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,708.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 40017301406?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 29th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 35th, household 44th, minority 33th, housing 23th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 40017301406 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 40017301406 compare to Mustang overall?

Tract 40017301406 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Mustang at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mustang eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mustang

Top eight tracts in Mustang ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related