Within parent city
67
th percentile
Elevated
Census Tract · Ranked #68,306 of 84,120 nationally
Mustang Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 40017301410 · Canadian County, OK · pop 5,113
Here is how census tract 40017301410, in Mustang eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 3.9/10 eviction-risk score (Lower tier) across a population of 5,113. That is riskier than roughly 10% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
33% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,013 a month against an average household income of $80,385 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. Renters make up 29% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.4
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 19%
Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units2,318
Renter share29.1%
SVI overall0.43
Poverty rate6.7%
Median income$80,385
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
33
th percentile
Low
Within state
14
th percentile
Very Low
National
19
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Mustang and the region
Centroid at 35.3990, -97.7246 · click any tract to drill in
Why Mustang scores 2.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Mustang
3.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.8
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
6.7% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,013 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mustang
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mustang
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mustang
4.3
How Mustang compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 43
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 28%Socioeconomic
- 45%Household composition
- 40%Racial/ethnic minority
- 68%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.7%Housing insecurity
- 7.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.4%Food insecurity
- 9.7%SNAP enrollment
- 7.1%Transit barriers
- 9.3%No health insurance
- 17.6%Frequent mental distress
- 34.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Mustang
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 5.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Mustang eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Canadian County average of 4.1 and in line with the Oklahoma statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 43rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 10.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 40017301410
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40017301410?
Census tract 40017301410 in Mustang scores 2.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 40017301410?
Median gross rent is $1,013/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 40017301410?
6.7% of residents in tract 40017301410 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,113.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 40017301410?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 43th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 45th, minority 40th, housing 68th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 40017301410 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 40017301410 compare to Mustang overall?
Tract 40017301410 scores 2.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Mustang at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mustang eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Mustang
Top eight tracts in Mustang ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related