Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally

Mustang Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 40017301410 · Canadian County, OK · pop 5,113

With a score of 3.4/10, tract 40017301410 in Mustang, OK reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,113. The main counterweight is state political climate at 1.5/10.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 19% Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units2,318
Renter share29.1%
SVI overall0.43
Poverty rate6.7%
Median income$80,385

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Mustang
Elevated
Within county
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#19 of 37 tracts In Canadian County
Moderate
Within state
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#655 of 1,205 tracts In Oklahoma
Moderate
National
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#59,654 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mustang and the region

Centroid at 35.3990, -97.7246 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mustang scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mustang
3.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.8
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
6.7% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,013 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mustang
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mustang
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mustang
4.3

How Mustang compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mustang risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.4This tracttract 3014103.4Mustangparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county3.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 43

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mustang

Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.7/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.7/10.

15% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. At $1,013 a month, rents run 21% under what the rest of Mustang commands. Against Canadian County at 39.2%, 33% of renters here are cost-burdened.

That is riskier than roughly 29% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.9/10.

Rent consumes only 15% of average household income of $80,385, an unusually wide affordability cushion. It tracks the Canadian County average of 3.7 closely. 29% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 40017301410

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40017301410?

Census tract 40017301410 in Mustang scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 40017301410?

Median gross rent is $1,013/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 40017301410?

6.7% of residents in tract 40017301410 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,113.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 40017301410?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 43th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 45th, minority 40th, housing 68th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 40017301410 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 40017301410 compare to Mustang overall?

Tract 40017301410 scores 3.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Mustang at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mustang eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mustang

Top eight tracts in Mustang ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related