Skip to content
Chickasha, Oklahoma eviction risk overview
City brief · 16,539 residents

Chickasha, OK Eviction Risk: LOW

Grady County · Population 16,539

In 2026
Risk score
2.5
LOW

80th percentile, Oklahoma.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.1 Average2.5 Now2.5
3.3 2.1 1976 · score 2.8 1977 · score 2.8 1978 · score 2.7 1979 · score 2.7 1980 · score 2.8 1981 · score 2.7 1982 · score 2.8 1983 · score 2.8 1984 · score 2.6 1985 · score 2.6 1986 · score 2.2 1987 · score 2.1 1988 · score 2.1 1989 · score 2.1 1990 · score 2.1 1991 · score 2.2 1992 · score 2.5 1993 · score 2.5 1994 · score 2.5 1995 · score 2.5 1996 · score 2.5 1997 · score 2.5 1998 · score 2.6 1999 · score 2.5 2000 · score 2.5 2001 · score 2.4 2002 · score 2.4 2003 · score 2.5 2004 · score 2.4 2005 · score 2.3 2006 · score 2.2 2007 · score 2.2 2008 · score 2.2 2009 · score 2.4 2010 · score 2.4 2011 · score 2.4 2012 · score 2.3 2013 · score 2.3 2014 · score 2.3 2015 · score 2.3 2016 · score 2.3 2017 · score 2.3 2018 · score 2.2 2019 · score 2.3 2020 · score 3.1 2021 · score 3.3 2022 · score 2.5 2023 · score 2.5 2024 · score 2.6 2025 · score 2.6 2026 · score 2.5

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.7 Regional 2.7 State 1.8 Economic 7.6 Supply 6.8 Rent Control 4.3 Eviction 2.0 Tenant 9.0 Housing 6.0 2.5 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +62.7% (2024)
    2.7
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.7
  3. State political climate
    Oklahoma legislature & governorship
    1.8
  4. Economic stress
    18.9% poverty · 6.1% unemp.
    7.6
  5. Supply constraint
    $888 average · 47.3% renters
    6.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    26.4% of income on rent
    4.3
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    24 days filing → judgment
    2.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    47.3% renters
    9.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chickasha and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Chickasha compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Grady County
Very High
#2 of 14 cities
Rank in county, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 14 cities in Grady County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Oklahoma
High
#187 of 840 cities
Rank in state, 78th percentileLowHigh
#187 of 840 cities in Oklahoma for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Chickasha risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Chickasha: 2.52.5ChickashaThis cityCounty: 2.32.3Countyavg in countyState: 2.32.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.5
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.5/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 24d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $888/mo. A contested eviction takes 24 days and costs $890–$2,543 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 47.3%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 16,539 residents, 47.3% rent. 26% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 18.9% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.7
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.7 and 2.7 (GOP margin +62.7% (2024)). State climate at 1.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2, housing court bias 6, rent-control risk 4.3. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 7.6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 7.6. Supply constraint: 6.8. The numbers behind those: 18.9% poverty, 6.1% unemployment, 26% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Chickasha sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 20d 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Oklahoma City, OK · 26d · ~$1.9k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.2 Oklahoma City Norman, OK · 24d · ~$1.6k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.4 Norman Lawton, OK · 22d · ~$1.9k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.4 Lawton Moore, OK · 22d · ~$1.6k all-in ($75/day) · score 2 Moore Midwest City, OK · 26d · ~$1.6k all-in ($60/day) · score 2.2 Midwest City Tulsa, OK · 26d · ~$1.8k all-in ($68/day) · score 2.3 Tulsa Broken Arrow, OK · 23d · ~$1.7k all-in ($75/day) · score 1.9 Broken Arrow Edmond, OK · 24d · ~$1.5k all-in ($64/day) · score 1.9 Edmond Enid, OK · 26d · ~$1.7k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.2 Enid Frisco, TX · 24d · ~$2.1k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.2 Frisco Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Chickasha
Chickasha · 24d · ~$1.7k all-in ($72/day) · score 2.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Chickasha, OK

Landlording in Chickasha, Oklahoma, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.5/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Chickasha is a city of 16,539 residents where 47.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 26.4% of income on rent. At an average rent of $888/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Chickasha eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Chickasha closes 24 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Chickasha's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Chickasha runs $890 to $2,543 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 24 days of typical timeline and $888/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 9/10 in Chickasha, and the city has limited rent control exposure (4.3/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Oklahoma, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Chickasha: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Oklahoma's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,543 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Chickasha

Trap · 6/10
For landlords, the 4.3/10 score is most actionable when combined with Grady County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 6/10. Standard documentation and prompt action typically resolve cases quickly.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my Chickasha tenant makes a partial payment after I serve the 5-day notice?

If you accept a partial payment after serving a 5-day pay-or-quit notice, you generally waive your right to proceed with that specific eviction notice. You would likely need to issue a new 5-day notice if they still owe rent. It's usually better to decline partial payments during the notice period unless you've reached a formal payment plan agreement in writing.

Q2

Is there rent control in Chickasha, OK?

No, there is no rent control in Chickasha or anywhere else in Oklahoma. Oklahoma state law (41 O.S. § 115) prohibits local governments from enacting rent control. You can adjust rent as market conditions dictate, provided you give proper notice (typically 30 days for month-to-month tenancies). Read our Oklahoma rent control rules for more details.

Q3

How long do I have to return a security deposit in Chickasha?

In Chickasha, as throughout Oklahoma, you have 45 days after the tenant vacates the property to return the security deposit or provide an itemized statement of deductions. If you fail to do so, the tenant can sue you for double the amount of the deposit wrongfully withheld. Be diligent with your move-in and move-out inspections. For more, see Oklahoma security deposit rules.

Q4

Can I evict a tenant in Chickasha for violating lease terms other than non-payment?

Yes. If a tenant violates other material terms of the lease (e.g., unauthorized pets, property damage, illegal activity), you must typically issue a written notice specifying the breach and giving them a reasonable time to cure it (often 10-14 days, though the lease can specify). If they don't fix the issue, you can then proceed with an eviction filing. Always check your lease for specific cure periods.

Q5

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Chickasha?

You are not legally required to have a lawyer for a simple, uncontested eviction in Chickasha. However, if the tenant hires an attorney, disputes the eviction, or raises complex legal defenses, having your own attorney is highly recommended. An attorney can ensure proper procedure, represent your interests, and save you significant time and potential financial loss.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.5/10 places Chickasha in the 80th percentile of Oklahoma cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.