Census Tract · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally
Fort Gibson Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 40101001401 ·
Muskogee County, OK · pop 3,896 · 81% of tract blocks fall in Fort Gibson
Census tract 40101001401 covers part of Fort Gibson, OK, and scores 3.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,896. The severe-burden share is 39%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18%Stable renters 14%Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units1,655
Renter share31.8%
SVI overall0.70
Poverty rate19.9%
Median income$67,269
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Fort Gibson
Moderate
Within county
53th percentile
#10 of 20 tracts In Muskogee County
Moderate
Within state
58th percentile
#513 of 1,205 tracts In Oklahoma
Elevated
National
38th percentile
#52,479 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fort Gibson and the region
Centroid at 35.7978, -95.2685 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fort Gibson scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fort Gibson
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.3
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
19.9% poverty · this tract
5.0
Supply constraint
$737 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Gibson
9.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Gibson
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Gibson
8.6
How Fort Gibson compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 70
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
13.5%Housing insecurity
10.8%Utility-shutoff threat
17.8%Food insecurity
15.3%SNAP enrollment
10.2%Transit barriers
9.2%No health insurance
18.8%Frequent mental distress
41.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fort Gibson
56% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Muskogee County average of 41.1%. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 9.3/10.
The poverty rate is 20%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. On the national scale it lands near the 38th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 13% of average household income of $67,269, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Muskogee County average of 3.8 closely. Average gross rent is $737, close to the Fort Gibson average.
32% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 40101001401
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40101001401?
Census tract 40101001401 in Fort Gibson scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 40101001401?
Median gross rent is $737/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 40101001401?
19.9% of residents in tract 40101001401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,896.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 40101001401?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 70th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 51th, household 54th, minority 64th, housing 89th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 40101001401 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 40101001401 compare to Fort Gibson overall?
Tract 40101001401 scores 3.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Fort Gibson at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Gibson; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.