Census Tract · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally
Porum Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 40101001502 ·
Muskogee County, OK · pop 2,362 · 23% of tract blocks fall in Porum
Census tract 40101001502 covers part of Porum, OK, and scores 3.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,362 residents. Against Muskogee County at 41.1%, 18% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 13%Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units994
Renter share15.4%
SVI overall0.77
Poverty rate20.6%
Median income$56,591
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Porum
Moderate
Within county
63th percentile
#8 of 20 tracts In Muskogee County
Elevated
Within state
58th percentile
#513 of 1,205 tracts In Oklahoma
Elevated
National
38th percentile
#52,479 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Porum and the region
Centroid at 35.3699, -95.2321 · click any tract to drill in
Why Porum scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Porum
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.3
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
20.6% poverty · this tract
5.2
Supply constraint
$713 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Porum
3.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Porum
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Porum
6.3
How Porum compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 77
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
15.7%Housing insecurity
12.9%Utility-shutoff threat
23.8%Food insecurity
22.3%SNAP enrollment
12.6%Transit barriers
11.4%No health insurance
19.9%Frequent mental distress
50.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Porum
Disability prevalence runs 50.2% against 31.5% nationally. The clearest offset is state political climate at 1.5/10.
Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2/10. The poverty rate is 21%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
On the softer side, local political climate reads 2.5/10. At $713 a month, rents run 18% over what the rest of Porum commands.
SNAP participation runs 22.3% against 15.2% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 38% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
At 15% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Against average income of $56,591, annual rent is just 15%. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 40101001502
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40101001502?
Census tract 40101001502 in Porum scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 40101001502?
Median gross rent is $713/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 18% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 40101001502?
20.6% of residents in tract 40101001502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,362.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 40101001502?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 77th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 75th, household 96th, minority 47th, housing 44th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 40101001502 struggle to pay rent?
About 15.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 40101001502 compare to Porum overall?
Tract 40101001502 scores 3.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Porum at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Porum; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.