Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Shidler Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 40113940011 · Osage County, OK · pop 1,470 · 16% of tract blocks fall in Shidler
40113940011 is a census tract in Shidler, OK. It scores 3/10 for landlords. It is home to 1,470 residents. roughly one in eight of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Osage County average of 29.1%.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%
Stable renters 12%
Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units553
Renter share14.1%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate9.8%
Median income$68,063
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
25
th percentile
Low
Within state
35
th percentile
Low
National
20
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Shidler and the region
Centroid at 36.8291, -96.6110 · click any tract to drill in
Why Shidler scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Shidler
3.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.0
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
9.8% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$730 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Shidler
2.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Shidler
4.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Shidler
4.2
How Shidler compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 58
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 48%Socioeconomic
- 80%Household composition
- 30%Racial/ethnic minority
- 55%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.9%Housing insecurity
- 8.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.9%Food insecurity
- 11.7%SNAP enrollment
- 7.7%Transit barriers
- 8.1%No health insurance
- 17.0%Frequent mental distress
- 39.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Shidler
The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1.2/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.8/10.
Average gross rent is $730, 12% below the Shidler average. Against the Osage County average of 3.6, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.6 points.
That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.2/10. Rent consumes only 13% of average household income of $68,063, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 40113940011
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40113940011?
Census tract 40113940011 in Shidler scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 40113940011?
Median gross rent is $730/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 12% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 40113940011?
9.8% of residents in tract 40113940011 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,470.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 40113940011?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 80th, minority 30th, housing 55th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 40113940011 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 40113940011 compare to Shidler overall?
Tract 40113940011 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Shidler at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Shidler; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related